Laserfiche WebLink
k <br /> t <br /> Ms. Grandy asked if there were any other comments. (There was no other <br /> public Comment.)-Ms. Grady thea asked if there was a need for further <br /> discussion among the board members. <br /> Ir.'Ball felt that in his opinion there were too many gray areas at this <br /> time that could be worked out with the inspectors, Mr, raci was the only <br /> one that had shown up tonight. He did have a fever concerns especially on <br /> the new Title V systems that had been put in in the last five years that <br /> were stili working. He believed that during the original inspection if the <br /> risers were there and the stone wasn't correct. It would have been <br /> corrected at that time, But, apparently it went by therm somehow. If they <br /> were to pass this would they consider a grandfathering of the new Title I <br /> systems that had been put in within the last two years? It appeared that <br /> this regulation was more geared to elder systems that might not have had <br /> ass-builts or what type of stone-or how much, He felt that they continued <br /> this and fine tune it a hit more with a draft inspection report so h <br /> p p tat they <br /> could all be on the same page so that it would be easier on thea eats <br /> installers and the homeowners. He would like to make a motion to <br /> continue this agenda item. <br /> Ms. Grady asked if here was a second. <br /> Mr. Santos didn't share his Griew. Nothing was going to be grandfathered <br /> as far as new or old Title V. This was an inspection if the system two or <br /> twenty years old, It was for the protection of the new homeowner versus <br /> Erhart the old homeowner had been doing to the system# some people <br /> maintain their systems correctly and have them pumped every two or <br /> three years like they should. Other people don't and wait until they back <br /> up or fail to do the maintenance. Mr. Graci brought up some goof! points. <br /> But, in his opinion a few hundred dollars is nothing in regards to narking <br /> sure that the system was in a passable condition versus ignoring the <br /> inspection of the SAS and having to replace the system for thousands of •, <br /> dollars within sic months of the transference of property. He felt that the <br /> regulation was good. He felt that all of the bases were covered. He slid <br /> bring up another point under 4 "C". Title V specified that they could not do <br /> less than what they required. if they were going to be increasing bedroom <br /> space they would have to know ghat amount of stone was available. He <br /> felt that the use of the probe was fine if the state felt that that was an <br /> adequate method of inspection. <br /> Mr. Harrington interjected that if he looked at the first page. The previous <br /> policy for the leaching pit was that if they dict not have the -hour <br /> retention was basically a cesspool rule. It was not for ar leaching pit. Title <br /> V did not in the inspection guideline stated that they could not use that <br /> 1 <br />