My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/1/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
7/1/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:45:09 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:31:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/01/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> a <br /> M <br /> ■ <br /> 5 for a leaching pit. It could only be used for a cesspool. To determine <br /> whether It had 4-hours of retention below the invert they had to know the <br /> dimensions including the stone. The stone gave them the additional area <br /> outside of whatever diameter-leaching pit it wase That was one time they <br /> would definitely go to have to determine; again they were not saying how <br /> they were going to determine it. They could use a probe a determine it. <br /> That was fine. They still needed to describe how they were going to <br /> determine it. He felt that it was valid in the Way it was written, <br /> Mr, Grad interrupted the conversation and stated that the rules state that <br /> they had to dig up the SAS. if it was not a leach pit and it was infiltrators <br /> and the previous installer did not raise an inspection port. What were they <br /> supposed to do at that time? You were trying to find a four-inch cap under <br /> four feet of dirt. They could tell him how they would Bice that gone and he <br /> would be happy to do it. That was some serious digging, <br /> Mr. Darrington did not disagree with him. However he would have to a <br /> least exposure the stone or get down to the point where he could probe <br /> the stone so he would know he was in it, <br /> Mr* Graci then asked what the -hour retention area was in an infiltrator <br /> that was what three-feet wide. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that that was only for pits. <br /> Ms. Warden stated that if stated in the regulation that it was a cesspool <br /> and leaching pit. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that Title V didn't even use that for the other <br /> trenches or fields* so it would not apply to theta. <br /> Mr. Crani asked the board if they shouldn't make some type of by-later for <br /> the infiltrators too. <br /> Mr. Harrington felt that they could add an inspection report because they <br /> certainly had done that before. They were starting to do that on a design <br /> basis. A lot of those systems went in. one problem with the infiltrators <br /> was that they couldn't inspect therm because they have no ports on therm. <br /> Mr. Grad re-iterated that there was a "knuckle"ckle" a four-inch knuckle kl in a <br /> o' field. They would have to be pretty precise as to where they were <br /> going to start digging. <br /> Mr. Harrington understood his concerns. But that one he didn't have an <br /> answer too. <br /> 'l� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.