Laserfiche WebLink
t ' <br /> k <br /> the board of health for all required repair inspections." This was just to <br /> give them some kind of timeline by which the work had to be done. All soU <br /> absorption systems must be inspected at the time of property transfer. <br /> This wasn't anything never. There were several towns that had already <br /> adopted this. The state required the tank and the D-box had to be looked <br /> at. It was definitely within their realm to take it one step further to fools at <br /> the leaching. It was in everyone's best interest to look at the leaching <br /> also. The D-box was the key. You could tell quite a,bit from the <br /> distribution box. Having the leaching looked at kind of answers all of the <br /> questions. on the third one under inspections if the violation of the 1978 <br /> or 1995 Title V code was identified the inspector shall report the violation <br /> and certification statement section of the inspection report entitled <br /> "needs further evaluation by local approving authority." That came into <br /> play when you were looking at setbacks, light now if the cesspool was <br /> off the property onto the neighbors Title 1 allows it to be passable. That <br /> way if there were other factors involved besides it being off of the <br /> property. Then it gives the board of health a chance to make a comment. <br /> They could decide at that point what needed to be done. It would lead up <br /> to the board's discretion. Again, this was also something that the town's <br /> had done. <br /> Ms. Grady opened the 'meeting up to public comment. <br /> Mr. John Graci introduced himself of John Graci septic Inspections, Inc. <br /> His question to the board was that to determine how much stone there <br /> was around a leaching pit, He could understand their point totally. <br /> However, the biggest downfall was whether or not it was under asphalt or <br /> a stonewall? You were talking New seabury with very tight areas where <br /> people put galls over Muff. Were they going to be digging stuff up if it <br /> was sic or seven feet deep, how were they supposed to determine that? It <br /> would require some major excavation, could they probe it if they had <br /> something four, five or sic feet deep? Was that acceptable? If it were <br /> under a driveway hove would they like therm to attempt that? <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they could make that a conditional pass and let <br /> the board deal with it at that point. They would also have to make sure if <br /> it was an H10 or H20 pit. They needed to determine that. It was going to <br /> have to be dug up to determine that anyways at least to get to the cover. <br /> The other part of this was no remote cameras. It would have to at least be <br /> inspected. They would have to.at bast dig down to the cover. There <br /> would have to be damage done to the properties to at least get to the <br /> cover. It could be determined by just getting down to the cover to <br /> determine the stone around it that way. <br /> Mr. Graci continued by stating that if he understood them correctly. It was <br /> 4 <br />