My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/22/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
7/22/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 2:32:06 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:31:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Mr. Harrington interjected that he understood what it was. But, if it was <br /> retaining any portion of the leaching the building code stated that the <br /> hydrostatic wall had to be a poured wall. It could not be a concrete block <br /> wall. <br /> Mr. Costa replied that the wall was only one-foot tall. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that it was only doing fill. <br /> Mr. Costa stated that it was only two six-inch blocks. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that it would not be a hydrostatic wall. That was <br /> okay then. Something that he recommended was that the house be put on <br /> piles rather than the concrete. That way the tanks could be put <br /> underneath the house, if they were going to keep the house this size. The <br /> other recommendation was to make the house smaller. This was a tiny <br /> area of upland and the coverage was... <br /> Mr. Costa asked Mr. Harrington if the tanks were moved under the <br /> building, how much distance would he feel comfortable with between the <br /> tanks and the edge of the leaching facility. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that he would be comfortable with five-feet. <br /> Right now if he were stripping out and providing some waterproofing <br /> typically it was five-feet. That would give you more room for the leaching. <br /> The pump chamber and the RSF units are not a big deal because they <br /> were not up high. So they were not going to have any effluent coming <br /> back into them. He would say to move the tank and the reserve tank <br /> underneath the building in-between the piles. He was not going to get a <br /> basement there. <br /> Mr. Costa interjected that he had already spoken to the client and advised <br /> him that he should go with the piles. He just didn't show it underneath the <br /> building because he thought that it would just create a little bit more heat <br /> burn. He did not have a problem with putting them under the building. <br /> Mr. Harrington felt that the building was huge in taking up that much area. <br /> The other comment was that he would need to notify the southern abutter <br /> because he was less than 10' from the property line. <br /> Ms. Garron stated that Mr. Costa's secretary did tell her that that was <br /> done and that he would have the receipt tonight. <br /> . Mr. Harrington continued that they would need an operation and <br /> 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.