My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/9/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
9/9/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:02:27 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
y <br /> y <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they had done that. <br /> Mr. Grtkc stated that he had re-iterated what they had discussed at the previous <br /> board meeting and Mr. Sherman's comments from Conservation. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that Mr. Sherman had given hire a copy of a map delineating <br /> the coastal bank. Mr. Gr t ke didn't have it yet. He had spoken with Mr. Sherman <br /> about this issue. While Mr. Sherman was out sick there was a decision made by the <br /> board that they were going to re-open because there had been a straight denial by the <br /> Conservation Commission. They were going to re-open the conservation portion of <br /> the file. Mr. Sherman gave him a neap that he was going to approve and recommend <br /> to the Conservation board for the coastal bark and the resource areas. That was <br /> really all the board df health needed to know to make their decision regarding the <br /> septic system. The Mashpee Conservation agent had delineated the coastal bank and' <br /> the resource areas. As long as that was done the board could make a further <br /> determination. Right now they did have the FAST system purpsed'and it was not <br /> being sold because it had already met its quota. Therefore, Mr. Grotke was going t <br /> be changing technology. Correct` <br /> Mr. Gr t ke stated that that was correct. Pending the board's approval they would be <br /> agree to change it to an Amphidrome system. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that the LTV systemwouldn't change because there was no <br /> technical requirement regarding the manufactures burden for that. The Amphidrome <br /> had provisional approval so that it could be used. The other issue was that he needed <br /> to notify the abutter because the system was seven-feet away from the property line. <br /> There was a reserve area. Hewasn't sure who owned the reserve area. <br /> Mr.,Grot ke stated that it was a reserve area for the village. The adjacent abutter on <br /> the other side was also the owner of this property. So the affected abutter of this <br /> septic system would be the chap to the left who was the owner. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that the other responsibility that the board of Health was in <br /> charge of was determining if the effluent would affect the coastal bank. The addition <br /> of the UV and alternative systems should take care of the effluent quality from <br /> system. This was all pending approval of the final floor plans. Hever, they were <br /> not going to go ahead with difficult floor plans on a property like this without board <br /> approval of the septic system. Those were his comments essentially and Mr. Gr t ke <br /> also needed a land surveyor stamp. <br /> Mr. Grtke continued by stating that the difference with the local by-law and the <br /> state regarding the top of the coastal bank was the taking into account of the sea <br /> level rise within 100-years. It was projected that within I -years they would have a <br /> one-foot rise within sea level. The town felt that it was prudent to use the 1 ' <br /> elevation plus. The definition they always used was the state definition for a coastal <br /> bank, which was different somewhat from the town distinction. What would help <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.