Laserfiche WebLink
J <br /> r <br /> rather than having to come hack since the technical elements will he the same and <br /> the setbacks will not change. what they had been discussing here was that instead of <br /> a PAST system there would he a change to an Amphidr me system. The tank would <br /> be slightly different. The critical elements will remain as shown n,the plan before <br /> the board members. whether the additional one-foot in change of elevation of the <br /> coastal hank would not really affect the merit of the plan. It would remain as the <br /> hoard sees it now. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if Mr. Grotzke believed that the leaching would be out of the coastal <br /> hank area as delineated by Mr. Sherman. <br /> Mr. Gr t l e stated that it would definitely he outside of the coastal bank. <br /> Mr. Harrington agreed that it would he 150' of their regulation. It would actually he <br /> n the seaward side. They were not even on the landward side 150'. <br /> Mr. Gr t l e stated that one thing he wanted to mention that these were the existing <br /> conditions. The proposed conditions were that the house with foundation would <br /> intercept the flow from the septic system. It would he like constructing a large <br /> retaining wall with from the left to the right side of the lot. <br /> Mr. Harrington advised Mr. trot ke that he needed to show the nitrogen loading <br /> calculations on the plan. The propel was less than 10,00 0 square feet and he <br /> needed the credit from the IA system. The minimum square footage was 6000. The <br /> denitrification system gave him the 10,000 square feet for the lot. He added that <br /> variance number five should he a 150' setback. He continued by starting that with <br /> this property being as difficult as it was. The board could still as a condition that <br /> they find another piece of property. They do meet the nitrogen-loading portion of it <br /> with the other variances. But, as far as Title V... <br /> Mr. Ball suggested that they get a set of plans with everything correct n it with all <br /> of their concerns addressed on it. <br /> Mr. Santos was in agreement with Mr. Ball, <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to continue. Mr. Santos seconded the motion. Motion . <br /> passed. <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> A. DCPC Meeting & Comments <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that at the previous meeting he discussed some of his <br /> comments as Mr. Santos had attended the chairman of the selectmen's meeting at the <br /> DCPC. Also, Ms. Mason had requested that the department heads come up with <br /> some comments. He just wanted to submit those comments to the hoard members for <br /> review. That was the memo dated August 301', 2004. He also attended the meeting at <br /> the high school in the auditorium regarding the DCPC. It was basically the planning <br /> 2 <br />