Laserfiche WebLink
other conditions. That would be coning into full compliance with Regulation 70. <br /> because the monitoring well was not shown on the plan along with the monitoring <br /> r that well. That would be the testing of the total nitrogen quarterly. A couple o <br /> variances were also not:requested and put in as approved. The would have to <br /> �. pp meet <br /> the 10 nil per liter nitrogen. That would not have done a whole lot of good because <br /> that system would'not get less than 10 ml of nitrogen. He had sent those comments <br /> to Mr. Sla insky. But, he had not received a revised plan requesting those variances <br /> from them. He did let there know that they would have to request a variance too <br /> g <br /> from the 10 to the 2 , which was what the board had been allowed previously for <br /> commercial property. It was up to the hoard as far as what the wanted to do <br /> regarding the time lines for installation. They could allow the request for an <br /> extension. He asked Mr. McNulty if he knew about the whole process as to the <br /> necessity for the installation of the denitrification system at the time of the purchase. <br /> Mr. McNulty confirmed that he was aware of the process. <br /> Mr. Harrington continued by stating that the hoard had provided all of the <br /> requirements and he knew at the time... <br /> Mr. McNulty interrupted Mr. Harrington and stated that they did discuss the <br /> necessity of the installation and the time lines were set. He was sorry that the board <br /> did not receive the plans until a month after the due date. He tried to stand on fir. . . , <br /> Sl vin.ksy's back with a whip as best as he could. He couldn't make him do anything <br /> apparently. If they had any financial means to make this happen they would. They <br /> just didn't. <br /> Mr. Harrington asked if there was some concession when he purchased the property. <br /> This was fully known when the Hills sold hien the property, was there any <br /> concession on the price regarding the price of the property'IIt was partially her <br /> responsibility too at the time of sale. <br /> Mr. McNulty responded that wasn't ghat they understood. They understood that it <br /> fell into the purchaser's lap. The seller had virtually no responsibility in it. They way <br /> it was explained to them was that it wasn't like Title V. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that it was not like Title v and that was correct. He didn't <br /> know if there wasn't anything set aside for them to draw upon. <br /> Mr. McNulty replied that there weren't any funds set aside for that purpose. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that he had a couple of things since everybody was looking at him. <br /> He remembered this meeting specifically because he was always against people <br /> buying property and suddenly not knowing if they were having a closing in a couple <br /> of days. The board beat over backwards to give hire a variance and an extension. <br /> Their Regulation 70 states that before the transfer happened like Title v with the <br /> transfer of ownership, the system was to be upgraded. Mr. McNulty and the previous <br /> 18 <br />