My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/27/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
01/27/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:05:53 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:49:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/27/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' he and Mr. Ball determined on Friday was that it was part of the original subdivision <br /> when the lard was subdivided. But, it was not drawn up as part ofthe original <br /> Buildings A-E.for the Deer Crossing Commercial Condominiums. It has had a <br /> separate owner up until Mr. Ha jar bought it. Attorney Dalton told him that he had <br /> actually bought it a year before he purchased the rest of the eonnnercial <br /> condominiums. <br /> Ms. Grady asked if Mr-. Hajj*ar bought the hank a year Before he bought Deer <br /> Crossing. <br /> Mr. Costello asked what septic system was it hooked into. <br /> Mr. Ham'n ton stated that it had a separate Title V system. But, they were asking rng for <br /> an increase to that property. He refused to sign it. He refused to sign a building <br />' pewit. <br /> Mr. Costello asked why they wanted an increase. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that they wanted to increase the size of the bank. It was <br /> offices by square footage. He refused to sign off`on that until the determination was <br /> made. He thought that they had enough information now that it was not part of Deer <br /> Crossing. Dior was it part ofthe Title V issues that the board of health addressed. H <br /> vas.relatively comfortable with saying that they did not have to include this in the <br /> overall project. Was he l00%positive?No. <br /> Mr. Costello stated that this whole solution was going to be a give and take all <br /> around. He thought that they could certainly not turn their heads to it. But, <br /> acknowledge that given the circumstances of the different ownership plus what was <br /> shown on the original plan. They could consider that as a separate entity and <br /> separate property for the purposes of these calculations. <br /> Mr. Ball and Mr. Harrington agreed with hire. <br /> Mr. Costello suggested that they get going. <br /> B. Creat Hq —Joe Weinstein <br /> Mr. Costello wanted to quickly add that he had had several,discussions with Jack <br /> Mc lhinney relative to the Weinstein case: <br /> Ms. Grady noted that she was not named in the suit. She was the chairman at the <br /> time. <br /> Mr. Harrington added that she also voted against it. <br /> Ms. Grady noted that she was the most vocal against it. <br /> I <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.