Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> waterline wrth some eprotection1f 1t CJI �i i ti b <br /> would have to show the drywells that were there for roof run-off. There was one <br /> comment to move them 25" from the leaching so that there was no interference. <br /> There would he a general approval for the FAST system with total nitrogen-teting <br /> quarterly for two years required and an operation and maintenance agreement. <br /> Ms. warden asked him if he was referring to the flower. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that it would be from the leaching. It was 10 scale not 2 <br /> scale. He pointed out the circles on the plans that shoved subsurface dry ells. <br /> They would be treated life a leaching catch basin and the setback was 2 '. The <br /> other comment that he had on those would be to move therm further dowry. This was <br /> only 1 ' to the primary. He just warted them to he moved dry to get further away <br /> r use common drywell . Just run the roof drainage into one in the middle. That <br /> way they would only need to dry-wells. They had some other variances to the cellar <br /> wall. They were going to provide a 40-mil waterproof memer to he installed along <br /> the entire front foundation wall. That would be fire. They were already right at the <br /> property line. They had to find out where the water main was too. Those were his <br /> recommendations. <br /> Ms. Grady asked if there were any other comments. <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to approve the letter from Cape & Islands dated January <br /> 19th 5 2005,, with the necessary revisions. The condition of the approval included the <br /> general approval for the FAST system with total nitrogen testing quarterly for two <br /> years and an operation and maintenance agreement. Mr. Santos seconded the <br /> motion. Motion approved. <br /> . Titley Variance Requested: Cape &Islands Engineering, 11 Sheffield Place <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that his only comment on this one was that typically in <br /> iconditions like this-the board required a denitrification only if the reserve area was <br /> used as proposed 1n its proposed location. They had the distances to all of the other <br /> wells. They had 150' from their own well arra from the abutters' wells except for <br /> the reserve area. Mr. Marsters owned the let next door se there was no notification <br /> requirement because they were within five feet of the property lire. You could not <br /> notify yourself as an abutter. <br /> Mr. Santos understood that the developer owned all of these abutting lots. was <br /> there something in place that the owner of lot 7 would he notified that SAS was <br /> within that property line or was that every worth doing? <br /> Ms.. Jrady stated that it would be after the fact. <br /> Mr. Harrington agreed and added that typically the next engineer that came along to <br /> design the system for lot 7 would see that the system was within five feet and that <br /> they could not be within 10' ofthat system. <br /> 2 <br />