Laserfiche WebLink
board would have to approve it and the IEP would have to approve it. The board <br /> had some leeway as to what they would allow. The hoard could say no and do it <br /> straight Title V. If those numbers start going up, he would start looking for ways to <br /> get out of it. That was what they needed hien for was to let him know. Mr.'McGrath <br /> would really be key because as the engineer he would be able to throw some <br /> proposed numbers out as far as providing a full compliant Title V system versus a <br /> system with variances. Mr. McGrath also had a feel for what the DEP would allow. <br /> That was why at the prior meeting suggested that they meet with the DER He <br /> didn't thinly they were quite ready to do that yet. They didn't even have their <br /> numbers straight as far as what they were going to have in the buildings yet. They <br /> did not know what they were designing for. <br /> 1r. Dalton re-visited the hope of wrapping it up in two weeps. Did they need to <br /> send a letter to therm instructing therm to revise the plans to meet the board's criteria <br /> for the actual uses in the buildings? They could make the other revisions so that <br /> they would have something to approve in two weeks. It might speed the process <br /> along. It was just a suggestion. <br /> Mr. Ball asked Mr. Brocado if he was aware that the board was in receipt of a letter <br /> from Mr. HaJj r requesting the removal of the fourth seat in his barbershop. <br /> Mr. Brocado responded that he was not aware of this letter. <br /> Mr. Ball revisited the 1600 GPD for Building D move by Mr. Najjar and that was <br /> done by letter. Their attorney just sent.the board another letter. He just read it. H <br /> didn't know where it was. They were equesting that be stay at the three seats and <br /> not the four seats. <br /> Mr. Brocado stated that this could be clone even though he had permission from the <br /> last board of health agent to have the fourth seat, <br /> Mr. Ball asked if this was verbal or written permission. <br /> Mr. Brocado said that it was verbal same as the original three. <br /> Ir. Ball stated that he researched his file and the only place he found it-in writing it <br /> was three seats. He could not find in writing a fourth scat anywhere else. <br /> Mr. Brocad o stated that the original three seats were a verbal communication as <br /> well. <br /> Mr. Ball understood what he was saying. But, he found it in writing for the three <br /> seats. If this went to court a verbal authorization would not count. The way he re- <br /> did the calculations on this the four seats were still in there. He wanted to make this <br /> into a little workshop if that was okay? <br />