My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/3/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
2/3/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:22:08 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:50:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/03/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e a done deal. He didn't think it was fair to everybody involved. <br /> Mr. Brocado stated that they had mentioned a little earlier that they did not have the <br /> property to put in a regulation Title V system for all of-the buildings. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that that would require some variances to either request a <br /> reduction in the size of the leaching facility or request Mr. McGrath...Once you <br /> were over 2000 GPD it requires a pressure distribution system. That was no longer <br /> gravity a pump was involved, which filled the pipes and the leaching facility. Again <br /> there was a cost added with that process. But, he didn't have the lana actually t <br /> even provide that size of a system. Every at the old Title V flows if Building D were <br /> built out he didn't have the land for it. <br /> R <br /> Mr. Brocado asked what the alternative was then. <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that he would have to request some variances. The hoard <br /> uld be in the driver's seat as far as what conditions they could put on it. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that it might cone to that soon. <br /> i Mr. Brocado asked what kind of variances could he request. Would it be reducing <br /> the size ofthe pits or reducing the size of the land area mass that was required t <br /> put it in` <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that he would have to reduce the am un oleaching that was <br /> necessary to do it. It was kind ofa sticky situation where you had the Title V flow <br /> 1600 GPD. But, the actual usage of the building was above that. They could use the <br /> remedial situation. It wasn't remedial because they were already over what they had <br /> and it was no longer a true remedy. If it was under a remedial'situation you could <br /> ask for a certain variance. Also, where an innovative/alternative system was being <br /> proposed you could actually provide % f the required leaching because you start <br /> getting credit back. But, the technology that he had chosen did not have any <br /> remedial approvals. Again, that was going to he something that he would have t <br /> talk to the IEP about and say, "Look I am putting in this $50,000.00 are you going <br /> to give me any credit for it. Right now they weren't giving them any credit for it as <br /> far as being a remedial situation. It merely r et their requirement. That was his <br /> decision to make. All the other technologies out there had a remedial approval <br /> here he could either have a drop to grundvater or he could reduce the... y 40 or <br /> %, which was huge as far as tearing up asphalt. There were other things out there <br /> for hire use. The pressure distribution on the systems that were over 2000 GPD. H <br /> could ask for a variance not to do that. I would have to be approved by the hoard <br /> and the IEP. The other bacterial augmentation that Mr. McGrath had was another <br /> technology and another company that he had started to reconstitute failed leach pits. <br /> The hoard would have to approve that. As far as he knew right now he didn't have <br /> any approval to use that. It was a new tebhnology that Mr. McGrath had started. H <br /> said that it had been tested and it worked. It took some time to work. But, again, the <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.