Laserfiche WebLink
make a decision. It was discussed whether or not to consult with the building department before <br /> moving forward with an approval. It was determiner)that Mr. Picard, Mr. Robbins and Mr. <br /> Fudala would leave the meeting to view the proposed project with the contractor and obtain <br /> accurate measurements. <br /> The meeting re-formed upon the Commissioner's return from the on-site visit. It was determined <br /> that the locations of the posts, as indicated in the plans, are acceptable. The door is located 20 <br /> inches from the top of the steps. Since the deck would have ended in the middle of a window, it <br /> was decided to extend the deck by 2 feet toward the back of the house, past the window. <br /> Additionally, lattice will be added to match what is existing on the other deck at the home. The <br /> Commission has requested an updated set of plans, which Mr. Lubrano has agreed to provide. It <br /> was determined that the new deck will match the home, which features white trim. The new <br /> deck will be white except for the decking and handrail caps which will remain natural. The <br /> conditions for the Certificate of Appropriateness are as follows: <br /> 1) Revised plans and elevations will be submitted including the connection to the roof, the <br /> window and door locations and the addition of lattice beneath the deck. <br /> 2) The deck will be white except for the decking and handrail. <br /> 3) The Certificate of Appropriateness will be released upon review and approval of the revised <br /> plans by Mr. Robbins and Mr. Picard. <br /> Mr. Lubrano will drop off the revised plans on Thursday or Friday. Multiple copies of the plans <br /> will be needed since the Building Department will also require a set of plans. Mr. Robbins noted <br /> that the application regarding the description of work should be re-written to include demolition <br /> and the asbestos siding, as well as other changes to the original application. <br /> Motion made by Ms. Spencer to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the re- <br /> vamped project plans. Motion seconded by Mr. Robbins. All voted unanimously. <br /> Other Items: <br /> 302 Main Street <br /> The shed and gutter projects had received an initial review through the sub-committee and it was <br /> determined that those projects did not require full Commission review. Pier Iovino attended <br /> tonight's meeting to obtain feedback from Commission members regarding his plans to update <br /> the jalousy windows on the front of his home facing Route 130. W. Iovino questioned whether <br /> he should use double hung windows to match other existing windows or if he should use sliding <br /> windows. Mr. Iovino expressed his concern about the current aluminum windows holding the <br /> roof in place, to which Mr. Robbins responded that proper engineering should be completed but <br /> that it was likely a header would be needed. Mr. Robbins suggested that the double hung <br /> windows would be a better option, along with the addition of posts to support the windows. The <br /> Commission also discussed the height of the windows and Mr. Robbins suggested the possibility <br /> of installing a slightly larger window such as a more standard 49 inch window. The project <br /> would require a Certificate of Appropriateness and public hearing with the Historic District <br /> Commission. Mr. Iovino will need to complete an application and submit his plans. <br /> 2 <br />