Laserfiche WebLink
Tom9n of Washpee <br /> IG G�rui dyffl<'I�±1a�t Re1f��•tlr <br /> `�sLI''" ?Ytaslipee,Uissaclurselfs-02649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> FINDING-2017-49 <br /> Michael Cusack Doc.#: 1023639 <br /> 46 Quail Hollow Road Ctf. #: 179015 <br /> {Map 58 Parcel(s) 54 & 55) <br /> Mashpee,MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on July 19, 2017 by Kevin Kieler, Petitioner requesting a <br /> Written Finding under §174-17 and §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for a kitchen <br /> and living room addition on property located in an R-5 Zoning District,at 46 Quail Hollow <br /> Road, (Map 58 Parcel(s) 54 and 55),Mashpee,MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A.Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise,a newspaper of <br /> general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on July 28, 2017 and August 4,2017 a copy <br /> of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §6 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning Bylaws. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at which time the following members of the Board of <br /> Appeals were present; Chairman, Jonathan Furbush, Vice Chairman, William Blaisdell, <br /> Board Members, Ron Bonvie, Dom DeBarros, and Scott Goldstein, and Associate <br /> Members, Brad Pittsley and Norman J. Gould. Also present was Building Commissioner, <br /> Michael Mendoza. <br /> At the request of the applicant,the hearing was continued until September 13,2017 <br /> to supply the Board with a revised plot plan that depicts the proposed rear deck. <br /> Mr. Kevin Kieler, with Permit Solutions represented the homeowner, Michael <br /> Cusack. The project consists of a kitchen and living room addition, and reconfiguring the <br /> interior of the existing portion of the dwelling. Mr. Kieler presented a revised plot plan of <br /> the proposed project because the Board wanted to see the dimensions of the existing rear <br /> deck,however the rear deck is not being extended, and the homeowners will only will be <br /> replacing the decking. The front deck will be rebuilt in the same foot print,and will remain <br /> 27.03 ft. from the front yard setback. The proposed rear deck currently exists in the 50 ft. <br /> buffer setback from the water and wetlands and is the reason the request for a Written <br /> Finding. <br /> 1 <br />