Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> Michael Cusack <br /> 46 Quail Hollow Road(Map 58 Parcel(s) 54 & 55) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2017-49 <br /> General Findings: <br /> The subject lots(#42 and#46)were combined and is approximately 25,442 square <br /> feet which makes the lot one of the largest in the neighborhood. <br /> There were no abutters present. However, there were several letters from the <br /> neighbors in support of the project. <br /> Written Finding Criteria: <br /> §174-33. Setback from water and wetlands. Any building or structure, exclusive <br /> of fixed or floating piers,wharves,docks,bridges or boardwalks, shall be set back at least <br /> fifty(50)feet from any water or wetland as defined by MGL C. 131, §40. <br /> §174-17. Continuance; Extensions; Alterations - Lawfully created structures or <br /> uses may be continued,although not conforming with the provisions of this chapter.Non- <br /> conforming single-or two-family dwelling structures may be changed, extended or altered <br /> if such change, extension or alteration complies with the dimensional requirements <br /> applicable to the lot under current provisions of §174-31 or, for lots which have been <br /> developed pursuant to §174-21, complies with such requirements as were applicable to <br /> initial construction of the dwelling under provisions of§174-21, <br /> Changes, extensions or alterations of non-conforming single- or two-family <br /> dwelling structures which do not meet the applicable dimensional requirements as set forth <br /> above, and changes, extensions or alterations of all other non-conforming structures, or <br /> non-conforming uses, may not be made unless there is a written Finding by the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals that such change, extension or alteration shall: <br /> • not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming <br /> structure or use to the neighborhood, <br /> • and,that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and setbacks <br /> as may be required. <br /> Although said Finding shall not constitute a Special Permit as defined by the <br /> General laws and this By-law, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall follow the procedures <br /> specified in the General Laws for Special Permits in processing requests for such Findings. <br /> Per Town Counsel: Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for a Finding of Fact Cannot <br /> involve a Variance in the Decision/Finding of Fact. No such thing as"use variance". The <br /> Decision must be rendered in two separate statements/decisions if a Variance or Special <br /> Permit is involved along with a Written Finding. <br /> 2 <br />