My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/11/2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
>
1/11/2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:47:23 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 2:46:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
ZBA Decision
Meeting Date
01/11/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> Thomas J. Murray and Kristin E. Murray <br /> 118 Waterway (Map 105 Parcel 220) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2017-05 <br /> There will also be a new state-of-the-art Title V septic system installed. The lot has <br /> substantial vegetation and mature trees along both property lines, and the 2+ ft. variance <br /> relief requested for the northerly side will not have any adverse impact on the abutting <br /> property owner. <br /> Attorney Kirrane said he applied for that Variance on the northerly side of the <br /> property notwithstanding the fact that there was a non-conformity side yard setback on the <br /> other side of the property. He said he didn't know what the Boards approach would be <br /> relative to considering the entire building as a side yard setback relief, or by creating a 12.1 <br /> ft. non-conformity on the northerly side as opposed to the southerly side, which creates a <br /> brand new non-conformity, so as such applied for variance relief of the 2.9 ft. on the <br /> northerly side of the property, and eliminating the non-conformity on the other side of the <br /> property. <br /> Attorney Kirrane pointed out to the Board that the homeowners prefer to keep the <br /> vegetation and mature trees to create privacy from the abutting properties. He concluded <br /> that the proposed new dwelling project will have sufficient parking, and will have the <br /> adequate setbacks consistent with the neighborhood. <br /> Mr. Furbush read the Board of Health, Conservation, and Inspection Department <br /> comments into the record. <br /> WRITTEN FINDING CRITERIA: <br /> ARTICLE V -Nonconforming Buildings and Uses: <br /> §174-17. Continuance; Extensions; Alterations - Lawfully created structures or <br /> uses may be continued, although not conforming with the provisions of this chapter. Non- <br /> conforming single- or two-family dwelling structures may be changed, extended or altered <br /> if such change, extension or alteration complies with the dimensional requirements <br /> applicable to the lot under current provisions of §174-31 or, for lots which have been <br /> developed pursuant to §174-21, complies with such requirements as were applicable to <br /> initial construction of the dwelling under provisions of§174-21. <br /> Changes, extensions or alterations of non-conforming single- or two-family <br /> dwelling structures which do not meet the applicable dimensional requirements as set forth <br /> above, and changes, extensions or alterations of all other non-conforming structures, or <br /> non-conforming uses, may not be made unless there is a written Finding by the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals that such change, extension or alteration shall: <br /> + not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming <br /> structure or use to the neighborhood, <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.