Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> Jason Stone <br /> 156 Waterway (Map 105 Parcel 238) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2016-40 <br /> Non-conforming single- or two-family dwelling structures may be changed, <br /> extended or altered if such change, extension or alteration complies with the dimensional <br /> requirements applicable to the lot under current provisions of§174-31 or, for lots which <br /> have been developed pursuant to §174-21, complies with such requirements as were <br /> applicable to initial construction of the dwelling under provisions of§174-21. <br /> Changes, extensions or alterations of non-conforming single- or two-family <br /> dwelling structures which do not meet the applicable dimensional requirements as set forth <br /> above, and changes, extensions or alterations of all other non-conforming structures, or <br /> non-conforming uses, may not be made unless there is a Written Finding by the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals that such change, extension or alteration shall: <br /> • not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming <br /> structure or use to the neighborhood, <br /> • and, that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and setbacks <br /> as may be required. <br /> Although said Finding shall not constitute a Special Permit as defined by the <br /> General laws and this By-law, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall follow the procedures <br /> specified in the General Laws for Special Permits in processing requests for such Findings. <br /> Per Town Counsel: Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for a Finding of Fact Cannot <br /> involve a Variance in the Decision/Finding of Fact. No such thing as "use variance". The <br /> Decision must be rendered in two separate statements/decisions if a Variance or Special <br /> Permit is involved along with a Written Finding. <br /> SPECIFIC WRITTEN FINDINGS: <br /> The Board determined; <br /> 1. The proposal will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non- <br /> conforming structure or use to the neighborhood. <br /> 2. The proposal will be an improvement to the lot and is similar in size and character <br /> to other existing structures in the neighborhood. <br /> 3. The proposed dwelling, based upon the plans submitted to the Board, will be <br /> consistent with applicable State and Town statues, regulations, bylaws and plans, <br /> complies with the dimensional requirements applicable to the lot under current <br /> provisions of §174-31 (Land Space Requirements Table Footnotes) #18 of the <br /> Popponesset Overly District, or for lots which have been developed pursuant to <br /> §174-21,complies with such requirements as were applicable to initial construction <br /> of the dwelling under provisions of§174-21 Nonconforming lots. <br /> 3 <br />