5/13/1992 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

r r TOWN OF MASHPEE Hoard of Appeals Minutes May 13, 1992 The Mashpee Board of Appeals held a meeting on Wednesday, May 13, 1992 at 7 : 30 P.M. at the Mashpee Town Hall . Board Members present and acting throughout were: John J . Friel , Michael A. Makunas, Cheryl A. Hawver, Edward M. Govoni, Arnold D. Mindick and Jamie Regan . Building Inspector Douglas S. Boyd was in attendance. Mr. Makunas opened the meeting and discussed reorganization of the Board . He moved to elect John Friel the Chairman. No . Hawver seconded . All agreed . Steven R. hall, - Requests a Special Permit under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to replace and relocate a non-conforming structure in an R-3 zoning district on property located at 55 Amy Brown Road ( Map 109, Block 28 ) Mashpee, MA. ( Owner of record : John D. Ball ) . Members sitting : J . Friel , M. Makunas, C. Hawver Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the applicant and presented plans of an existing shed which Mr. Ball wishes to relocate . The new location will be 4 ' from the property line rather than the existing 1 . 9 ' . He said Mr. Ball would be willing to rebuild the original structure if Board prefers this to a replacement . Mr. Friel read comments from an abutter in opposition as well as a comment from the Town Planner questioning the subdivision. Mr. Friel explained that this was not within the jurisdiction of the Hoard . Mr. Makunas requested file information on a previous application. Mr. Mindick questioned size of proposed structure and was informed it will be 8. 2 x 12 . 2 . Mr. Makunas reviewed an earlier Variance application which had been denied with prejudice and questioned if this was a substantially different application. Mr. Kirrane responded that the location is entirely different and it is now an expansion of a non--conforming structure . Steven Ball said he had approached the neighbor who objected without success at reaching an agreement . Mr. Friel stated that he felt the application was valid and Mr. Govoni agreed . Mr. Makunas moved that this was a new application and substantially different . Mr. Friel seconded . All agreed .