Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> creation of a low-end residential base line of future project <br /> build-out possibilities that inform the fiscal, traffic, and <br /> environmental studies. 'There are three ( basic base. lines, two <br /> of which assume a residential., mixed-residential and commercial <br /> development; the other being commercial under current zoning. <br /> The original Zimmerman/Volk study v is considered to be high-- <br /> end residential; the intent of the Study prepared by the Office <br /> of Thomas J.Martin O TJl is to create a lower market response to <br /> the Pfoiect, with the most likely actual outcome somewhere in a <br /> range between tho two. <br /> Mr. Brais acknowledged useful comment in response to the <br /> draft study has been received from 1 ashpee Commons . Also, a <br /> request has been made for the addition of an estimate indicating <br /> the breakdown of units from a demographic perspective, which will <br /> be of benefit to the various impact analyses as well (fiscal, <br /> environmental and traffic) . <br /> At this point, Mr. Brais made reference to a Memorandum <br /> dated 12-16-97, indicatirng percentage estimates of Empty Nesters <br /> and Retirees, Families, Younger Singles and Couples, as well as <br /> Seasonal Housing. <br /> Mr. Brais also made reference to a Memorandum citing those <br /> comments received from Mashpee Commons, which Mr. Brais has <br /> reviewed and discussed with Mr. Storrs. He referred to page -3- <br /> noting <br /> -noting the rental apartments within O TJM had been broken out <br /> differently than the /v as pointed out by Mashpee Commons) . <br /> Mr. Brais stated said differences could be reconciled within the <br /> final. draft. There was a similar comment made regarding the <br /> number of condominium units . one difference noted., which is <br /> important to the Study is that the low-range single family homes <br /> are depicted to be the highest number of units in this particular <br /> scenario will tend to be starter homes/younger families. It was <br /> agreed that although the market evaluation presentations were <br /> different, the oTJM indication of a price range of $350 to $900 <br /> per month does not greatly differ from the /v range of $ o to <br /> per month. Mashpee Commons noted a fain prase differential <br /> between the studies with reference to condominium sale prices. <br /> On the high-end single family homes, the oJM study capped out at <br /> $250, 000 . 00; which Mr. Brias explained as a reflection of the <br /> current market indication that water amenity homes tend to sell <br /> for over $250, 000. 00 . It was agreed that the absorption pace is <br /> not very different between the studies. <br /> At this point, Mr. Storrs responded to the Study by making <br /> inquiries relating to the broad concept. He suggested an average <br /> (balance) between the two studies be made; as well as whether or <br /> not the existing commercial and permitted (un-built) conerc ial <br /> within mashpee Commons is to be included in the Fiscal Impact <br /> Study. He requested the Committee make this determination. The <br /> one hundred 100 units currently permitted for Mashpea Commons <br /> have been included under Residential . Mr. Storrs stated he is <br /> -3- <br />