My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/24/1998 MASHPEE COMMONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes
>
9/24/1998 MASHPEE COMMONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2018 5:19:37 PM
Creation date
5/9/2018 12:42:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
MASHPEE COMMONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/24/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
regard to the matter of fertilizers, Mr. woods noted the Cape Cod <br /> Commission has adopted a fairly f!cons. rvativell number, twenty <br /> five percent of nitrogen loading fertilizer finds its way <br /> to the water. There is available data to support the fact that <br /> when turf is managed commercial, industrial, golf courses by <br /> a professional landscaper, as opposed to private hone <br /> owner/residential, the numbers are drastically lower. <br /> Mr. woods reiterated his need to understand more about the <br /> Tribal grant, its location, and the sensitivity to algae and to <br /> the viability of quahogs. <br /> 1► r. Green responded by explaining the location of the Tribal <br /> grant to be on the back side of Gooseberry Island, a fere <br /> acre shellfish grant. said five acres are currently being used <br /> as a nursery to grow seedling fish. Due to past development in <br /> this area, the only suitable use for this site is a nursery. <br /> Also, due to the high fecal count of this site, the Town has been <br /> forced by the state to close this location as a "working grant,, . <br /> However, the Town has granted the Tribe an eight acre site <br /> which is where the growing fish are deposited. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> Mr. Green acknowledged there are existing stresses upon the <br /> Mashpee River which are not attributed to the project at Mashpee <br /> Commons. However, in Mr. Green' s opinion, any additional impacts <br /> to the River will be detrimental . He made reference to current <br /> studies being conducted at the request of the Mashpee watershed <br /> Management Committee in order to determine solutions to saving <br /> both the River and the Bay. <br /> Mr. woods and Mr. Green were in agreement that in order to <br /> relieve the situation, some of the mass must be removed, as <br /> previously suggested by Mr. Wood.. Both gentlemen also agreed <br /> that some form of community treatment system in which resources <br /> would be combined would also make sense. However, Mr. Green <br /> noted this alternative is not an issue currently before the Town. <br /> Mr. Green stated he is very well aware, is familiar with, <br /> and has an understanding of the workings of the Mashpee commons <br /> Treatment Plant, which he described as " state of the art plant, <br /> that is pulling great numbers, and doing a fine b" . He stated <br /> his concern .is the potential for an increase in volume and <br /> potential problems therewith. <br /> Mr. Green further~ stated his suggestion is to remove the <br /> project completely from the opponessctMahpee River watershed. <br /> Regardless of where the increase originates, regardless of any <br /> gain, it would be a substantial loss to the Town if the River and <br /> Bay are lost. He stated his strong opposition to any increased <br /> impacts on the River. He also offered his services in order to <br /> find a resolution. <br /> Mr. Green reiterated he was expressing these concerns as a <br /> -6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.