My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/6/2012 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
>
3/6/2012 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2021 4:19:50 PM
Creation date
7/9/2018 3:24:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/06/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Plan Review Meeting Comments <br /> Original Meeting Date: Feb 7, 2012 Feb 281 2012 <br /> Nat Action <br /> At IteSheet ms Imt atm fates <br /> List of Town Comments <br /> Drainage re-design has <br /> 1■ May need a variance for storm water discharge. The A been provided in Site Closed <br /> design needs to accommodate nitrogen removal. Plans, supporting <br /> calculations provided <br /> Bio-retention basins may be an option to Bio-retention incorporated Closed <br /> avoid the variance process. <br /> The Town reported that the R3 Residential zone has <br /> 2. a height restriction of 5'. currently, the building RIBIRG variance issue will be en <br /> may exceed this height. A variance may be required B addressed at later date. � <br /> for relief. <br /> Per latest site drawings <br /> this will not be required to <br /> The Town indicated that shifting the building RKB/RG maintain buffers. Tribal <br /> 3, southward may provide a more optimum position on B Fonds are required and closed <br /> the site, do not grant to be <br /> impacted by a possible <br /> building shift <br /> The Torn indicated that it typically prefers to leave vegetation in buffers will <br /> 4, vegetation undisturbed, in its natural state when CA be maintained to the Record <br /> possible. maximum extent feasible, <br /> 269 Parking proposed total with 184 spaces paved. Paved parking space <br /> 5. The Town requires 199 spaces to be paved. CA requirements for the site closed <br /> Additional spaces beyond 199 can be gravel. have been met. <br /> According to R1 B} per the zoning bylaw— <br /> government office use required 1 for each This calculation has been <br /> 250 square feet of grass floor area...with CA used and is shown on Closed <br /> 46,322 gross square feet of space we page c-4 <br /> require 186 parking spaces... <br /> The parking is to remain <br /> May need to eliminate parking to CA as shorn and the buffer dosed <br /> accommodate buffer at north side of site. setback is shown and the <br /> buffer is metas required. <br /> A separate cleared <br /> access road has been <br /> shown on c-4 on the <br /> "Roadway"Torn access will need to be Town conservation <br /> maintained at Right-of-way to Town CA lands. Does not need an dosed <br /> property. official filing but does <br /> need review by the <br /> Conservation <br /> Commission, <br /> 0 All references to Retail needs to be deleted <br /> from civil plans, refer to the project as a CA Done dosed <br /> Government office building <br /> Additional interior island <br /> The Torn indicated that a 1:5 interior landscaping landscaping has been <br /> 6, to parking (ratio) is required. The design team will CA provided and the <br /> dosed <br /> confirm that this ratio is ret. t <br /> calculation shown on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.