Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES January 25, 1996 3 BOARD of BEALTH <br /> .) Reauest for verc extension 9 lad Sli er Lane - Mr. Evans relayed, "The <br /> owner is requesting a six month pere extension. i <br /> Mr. Ball motioned to grant a six month pere extension from date of expiration, Mr. <br /> Cram seconded, aR agreed. <br /> 6.) Annual re-V <br /> pointment, Animal Inspectors - Mr. Doherty motioned to appoint <br /> - - <br /> Ms. June Dale (Mashpee Animal Control Officer), and Dr. David Lowrance, D.V.M. as <br /> Animal Inspectors for the town of Mashpee effective March 1, 1996 to February 2 8� 1997, <br /> Mr. Ball seconded, all agreed. <br /> 7.) BCHED Smoking Cessation Class - Acknowledged. <br /> .) Recommendation from Town Counsel re: Boards a reerne t to Stipulation of <br /> Disn-issal" without pEdudice Rossetti vs. Bow � Continued until later in the meeting. <br /> 9, <br /> .Y.1. - Fin. Comm. disc roval for request of reserve funds for Horseshoebend <br /> wa /Triton Circle area 1 blic water connections ~- Continued until later in the meeting. <br /> APPOINTMENT: Title v Hearing - 23 Spoondrift way <br /> Mr. Ed Stone P.E., W. Greg Taylor, abutter, and Mr. Gordon Penmann, abutter <br /> were in attendance for this scheduled appointment. <br /> "' " `n <br /> Mr. McQuaid relayed, This plan was before the Board two weeks ago. <br /> Board <br /> "s reconendation at the time was to return the plans to the engineer because in nay <br /> . n there was tonch irrelevant information on the plan for a to even head or <br /> opo <br /> tail of it."" " t that time l did reconu aend the engineer notify all abutters of a full Title v <br /> heang s there are Title v variances requested."' "In reviewing the revised plan, which is <br /> just as bus as the first one l have sone questions l cold like addressed.," ``l do not see <br /> y <br /> ` h ere tests on the plan which is crucial because o the topography of the <br /> the location of the p <br /> land.", "Another concern is there are two wetlands involved, one is shown at 162), away, <br /> h to the south of theproperty at 7 " away from the proposed edge of <br /> the other � shown �� �� • <br /> leaching facility thus requiring at least a ' variation. would like that <br /> stone_ of the leas � g <br /> d numbered and the area of the leaching aoiit stared so that the <br /> wetlands flagged an <br /> delineation can be verified by our conservation officer." <br /> 1r. Evans stated, `The conservation officer did relay there is not information on <br /> the plans to review them." <br />