Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> MNLUES September 19, 1BOARD of HEALTH <br /> Mr. Ball motioned to grant a ' variance from the septic tank to the slab <br /> foundation, a 3' variance from the proposed leaching facility to the sideline, a 6" variance <br /> from the proposed leaching facility to the slab foundation, a 6" variance from the proposed <br /> leaching facility to the cellar wall, the top ofthe leaching trench will he approximately " <br /> deep instead of the 3' requirement, a variance from the requirements of a reserve area and <br /> a ' variance from the regulation which requires 12' between trenches,- Mr. Doherty <br /> seconded, all agreed. For the record* while the variance relief sought is numerous the <br /> Board agrees it is a significant improvement over the existing cesspools." <br /> APPOINTMENT: David Sanic i - 14 Peng Lane (revised) <br /> Mr. David Saniki, P.E., and abutters Mr. Lupo and IIs. Bexley were in <br /> attendance-for this scheduled appointment. <br /> N1r. S nic i stated "At a previous meeting we had a system, which you can still <br /> see the erasure on the plan where the system was before." "what has happened here is in <br /> the process, the physical well was physically in that location which opened up more area <br /> for us, with reference to this particular property, to establish the septic system 100' away." <br /> "That negated the requirement for a variance from the State with reference to the top of <br /> the coastal bank." CISo, when the actual well - when we located wells gears ago we <br /> located then in a non-intrusive method which is acceptable and is the standard practice." <br /> "But upon discovering the actual location of this particular well at house 9 19 it opened up <br /> and it was where vire preferred to have this system further away from the wetlands, further <br /> away from the river and so forth." `"we revised the plan based on the known existence of <br /> the well." '"In the initial plan, which I didn't bring other copies, previous to that the well <br /> was somewhere closer to the way here which pushed the system further away and that's <br /> why your anxious and we can see that clearly." "we had a number of discussions at the <br /> previous hearing."' "I am aware of Ms. Wilson's letter that was forwarded through fax to <br /> me through the Board not through her and she askingorn questions by C.M.R. <br /> references here." "The first one that she alludes to I couldn't find in any copy of C.M.R. <br /> 15.022(4)(S), I don't know what that is.1, "I didn't bring any copy but if you can fin <br /> 15022(4)(5) maybe I have something that"s been updated that I don't have." <br /> fir. Cram stated, ",15.02 2 in my copy is giving compliance period. "There is no s <br /> or 4 subsections." <br /> lr. S anic .i stated, "I have the same copy you have. "I couldn't find <br /> 15.022(4)(S)."" "It's either a typo or whatever." '"'The next one she alludes to 15.103 is a <br /> soilp rof e." "The soil profile in back is shown and if you see the soil log we had two soil <br /> tests clone on the property." "'The next one, the third one 15.104(4) it sags pert test, you <br />