5/25/1989 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Minutes

Home Browse Search

#F'F r t y BOARD of SELECTMEN MINUTES THURSDAY, MAY 25, 1989 PAGE THREE Selectman Hansen asked what the original responsibilities of the South Cape Beach State Park Advisory Committee were. M, Kirsner responded: The Agreement states the following: "that the committee shall continue to be responsible for making recom- mendations to the Department on such matters to include , but not limited to park management, and operation, rules and regulations , design of plan and review, The Department whenever possible, shall submit to the committee for review all architectural design plans , construction plans for facilities , including structures , waterways , and parking areas, in an effort to accomplish the project* The Department will include a clause in theproject' design contracts providing iding a periodic review by the committee �ttee during the duration of the contracts . The provisions of this agreement shall not be amended or chanced without the expressed consent and agreement of all parties thereto, except as othe wise provided in Paragraph 20, below. " Selectman Gottlieb stated that the question was , who does the Board want to represent it to enter into the serious discussions concern- ing the road from the park entrance to led Brook Road? rt I& LIN Selectmen Hansen stated that he thought if the. Board were' the powers 'to be, on this issue, they should he talking to the state as far as what should happen to that road. He stated further, 'cif you are an advisory committee, advising the state as to what u would like to !see inside and outside of i the park, you have done our job. if you cannot get there to more on the road, that is not our job, because it does beyond the scope of an advisory committee. �t decision of the Board f �f some pont �n time, � �. �t � the Selectmen, and if the committee ,has done j ut about everything they possibly can in expressing the views of the Selectmen a d the town, we would stop using that committee as a buffer, and coo directly to the state. M. Kirsner disagreed.. lir. Kirsner stated that he felt we had the ri g ht to pursue, and to try to pint into effect the recommendations we get from the Selectmen. Selectmen Lawrence added that if you feel , as the chairman, and if the committee feels , that you have the right under your charter to renegotiate with the state then you should do that. I think what we are interested in now, is coming up with a good plan, not deal- ing with a controversy between two committees. M, Kirsner stated that at the-is point,;_he-- felt that the committee should be permitted to pursue whatever they had to do within their realm, and that we, as a committee, would welcome your input in writing r as to what you want the MOU to include, and we will make every effort to consider it as being appropriate, and thea recom- mend it to the IE .