Laserfiche WebLink
" r + <br /> ''* ..,BOARD OF SELECTMEN 'age <br /> MINUTES <br /> MONDAY, JULY 29, 1991 <br /> Board of Assessors t <br /> new or old, they haven'-t given us the reason. that they may be grant. <br /> in g the a.ba.t e ent s. <br /> They only have one reason states Selectman Ca 'fin and that is <br /> legally to establish a fair and equitable market value of property, <br /> It' s absoultely legal. how about a percentage states Selectman Lawrence? <br /> All I aim asking for is before six months goes down the road states <br /> Selectman Lawrence to Find out that they are granting these things <br /> at a greater rate and that our liability increases. We ,a; to have <br /> some idea of what they are doing and how they are doing it. <br /> Is it a problem that Mr. Morley granted a. tremendous amount <br /> of abatements to New Seabury before he left office states Selectman <br /> C a.ffyn' Is that a problem This is the kind of thing that your <br /> implying and I don' t think it is fair. I think they should be here <br /> if y u are bringing this issue up,, <br /> I thin - -the logical thing is t ask e� in put it on the agenda <br /> t ask them come in again next week states Selectman Jacobsone <br /> Tim, did you have any comments towards this discussion <br /> The other element involved states Tim Vaccaro is there are <br /> several hundred oases in the Appellate Court. That will obviously <br /> alter the picture one way or another* -boo hundred oases suggests <br /> Sel.ectr a.n C af fyn. <br /> Where we stand now with approximately a $216, 000 deficit, in <br /> answer to what Andy was talking about, 'if it goes too much higher <br /> than that, adjustments ents would most likely have to be made to the .FY 92 <br /> bu g t, The decision would be made at Town Meeting in October, <br /> Right now, t eats the point I was making suggested Mr. Lawrence. <br /> I'm talking of the deficit for FY 90 states fir. Vaccaro. The decision <br /> is to ' e made in October so we can balance our budget. <br /> But all of these facts are kno�pn states Selectman Ca fyn. hTe <br /> had 2500 abatements with over 900 that went o to the Tax Appellate <br /> Court last year. No one brought that to the attention of the Selectmen <br /> of' this happening. This is not nes news, this is old news. The tax <br /> abatement process of the tax appellate court had to happen last year <br /> for thew to even be heard noir. <br /> My concern wa.s that I was trying to get a handle on where we were <br /> go-ming states Selectman Gottlieb. last week. So you killed the Messanger <br /> states Selectman C . fyn, I didn' t kill anybody, excuse me states Thr. <br /> Gottlieb. I asked a couple of questions to try to get some information <br /> a.tion <br /> and didn' t get anything that approached a satitfactory answer, to it. <br /> If I were to try again, I think tha.ts. appropriate. I didn' t try to <br /> kill anybody. I resent that directed at rae states Selectman Gottlieb. <br /> I asked lir. Greig and the Assessor, I thought quite clearly and quite <br /> properly a couple of questions last week. If that is killing somebody <br /> I guess what I am saying Andy is this is not a new problem for <br /> these new assessors states Selectman Gaff n. This is with the older <br /> assessors not bringing the in ar ation to understand the full extent <br /> of the problem. The extent of the problem is tremendous. The amount <br /> of abatements and the ar.ount in the tax appellate court. . . <br /> I was trying to get a. handle of what the extent of the problem <br /> s stated Selectman Gottlieb. <br />