Laserfiche WebLink
,r <br /> a <br /> Board of Selectmen <br /> #{ August 8 , 1979 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The interpretation ofthe word "proprietors" -eras addressed <br /> by the Supreme Judicial Court in the case of Simon et al vs . <br /> Sleinis et al 170 N.E . 421 . The reason J bring this to your <br /> attention is because of the existing uncertainty as to the <br /> ownership of the bridge . <br /> In 1978 I secured a recovery for the 'town of funds paid to <br /> H.C . LaBute , Inc . for emergency repairs to this bridge because <br /> of property damage occasioned by Arnold Delancey d/b/a Butch ' s <br /> Wrecker Service in plowing snow. At that time the Peninsula <br /> council disclaimed ownership of the bridge as did New Seabur r _ <br /> Corporation, and Field ' s point Manufacturing . I never was able <br /> to ascertain the true owner of the bridge t..o my own satisfaction <br /> .and I was able to secure the co-operation of the Peninsula <br /> council for the purpose of receiving the check for damages t <br /> the bridge.. <br /> Before any suggestion 's made to implement the procedure set <br /> forth in Chapter 84 , Section 12-14 , 1 would strongly recommend <br /> that the legal ownership of the bridge be ascertained. <br /> (Your very t.ru 1 r , <br /> a x <br /> i <br /> r ! <br /> .Jopi , erd <br /> f <br /> r � <br /> .J.J F d b i <br /> 'SELECTMAN"S APPROVAL <br /> EELEC <br /> DATE <br />