Laserfiche WebLink
' e <br /> r <br /> MASHPEE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING OMMITTEE MINUTES <br /> UTE <br /> AUGUST 17 , 1993 <br /> f ASHPEE TOWN HALL <br /> Present: Peter Hi ni zio, Merry Sue Ahlgren, Janice ill , Pau` <br /> Griffin , Bill Marti ro , Bill Jones , Joe Polito, Tom Fudal a <br /> Absent: Steve Gree l i h , Robe rit M1118 , Linda Murtha <br /> Also Present: Carl Fran e chi , D A, Gary Larson, CERA <br /> MeE)tinq convened at 4: 05 p.m, <br /> DISCUSSION WITH ARCHITECT <br /> Carl F r arks h i presented a Schedule of Meetings for the <br /> Committee' s review, He worked backwards from a proposed Nov . 1 <br /> special town meeting , They expect to have their final report a <br /> few weeks before that date but they need the appraisal <br /> information 2 weans before that to incorporate i t. The <br /> Executive Secretary is working on the RFP for the appraisal <br /> work . ) He suggested they meet bi-weekly prior to thatâ–  DRA can <br /> continue to rake progress between meetings and re8erve alternate <br /> weeks if something comes up <br /> The Committee agreed they have other businesq to take care of on <br /> alternate wee and will continue to meet weekly : preparing for <br /> Phase II work after town meeting , preparing RFP for the architect <br /> of the next phase, developing agenda' for those alternate weeks . <br /> Mr. Franceschi expects the geo technical engineer and traffic <br /> engineer tattend the meeting in 2 creeks to an8wer questions . <br /> Bill Jones asked if the traffic engineer would have a fairly <br /> definitive study at that time? The Committee would like a <br /> summary of the report/study. Mr . Fran e hi responded the <br /> traffic engineer will have come to their conclusions but it will <br /> not he in a final report format, <br /> The geo technical may be just the beginning of more information <br /> to come. <br /> The Committee reviewed the Site Selection Matrix presented by <br /> DRA. Mr. Franceschi explained it i' s a proposed format and the <br /> criteria can be ranked with a pos i t i v , negative or neutral , <br /> relative to the other site,. Each criteria will obviously have <br /> different "weight " *- <br /> Bill <br /> Bill J one, stated that aesthetic appeal is not on the criteria <br /> list, i . . one site overlooks the Quashri t River , one site i <br /> rolling and wooded . It is a vague term but is important. <br /> Joe added that creating a town center, giving the 'town a <br /> identity may also be important. Peter suggested -the overall <br /> impact to the town be considered. <br /> Mr . France h i noted there are secondary benefits, or negatives , <br /> the project creates that are beyond the proximity of the site.. <br /> You cannot get confused as to what is driving the project. <br /> 1 <br />