Laserfiche WebLink
explained itis a fire exit with exit only hardware, , <br /> Staff lounge Could be centrally located in each house . <br /> Provide foyer for auditorium, the dining facility is acting as that now but <br /> if there is a. barrier there will be congestion. <br /> There is a writing surface that can be applied directly to wall surfaces <br /> which may be cheaper than a framed unit but they were unable to get more <br /> information on that . <br /> Integrate the library closer to the academic wing . She feels presently <br /> there are several barriers . <br /> Simplify the library plan, the band room plan and dining facility for <br /> faculty. <br /> Ian explained none of these ideas are cast in stone . They are benchmarks <br /> for other ideas to get back to the ba.seli-ne . <br /> Peter asked how much is in the budget for value added? <br /> Paul explained 1/2 million for value added and 1/2 million for design <br /> changes <br /> Ian also stated the sewage treatment plan is estimated at $850 , 000-900 , 000 . <br /> His consultant thinks It may be closer to 500-600 000 and Steve Greelish <br /> agreed but noiq it is just a. matter of opinion. <br /> Paul said he talked with Chartwell about developing the report in different. <br /> catgor�io s- valUddd to the profit , cost sa. -ing�s to the budge th <br /> report, lacks that. . It looks at the construction cost issue but he does not <br /> see anything that talks about value added. We have to k-now where the value <br /> I S i <br /> Bill Cottrell said they will develop that information later , time was short <br /> during the workshop. They were concentrating on reducing the cost to got <br /> down to the budget , <br /> Paul said the Committee needs the other component in order to make choices <br /> He said ha.rtwel l ' s charge is to give the Committee a value analysis * <br /> Letting down to the budget is the charge of the architecist <br /> Ia.n said he is not sa iEg that 'Information will not be made available . if <br /> any of these items are not acceptable to the Committee , why proceed with a. <br /> value anal s i s o <br /> Janice said she feels like this is the second moeti.ng in a row where she is <br /> operating in a vacuum. Should the Committee do their homework and then <br /> respond to the report next week? If not it IS stupid to have a. Committee <br /> of towns people 9 <br /> MA' s report ha. 4 categories- <br /> We concur with the recommendat i.on. <br /> Needs further eva.lua.tion <br /> Requires owner direct ion . <br /> We do not concur/recommend o <br /> Ed Frenette said the first step is to see if the Committee concurs with the <br /> itemsIMIMA concurs withl, <br /> Paul asked sHMA if they had any other items they will be discussing other <br /> than this list? They have not identified additional items as of today. <br /> The full document lists the advantages and disadvantages of each <br /> recommendation, <br />