My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
8/9/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:12:25 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:07:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Elias spoke with DEP who said their revised flows for elementary and middle <br /> schools were reduced but remain at 20 gal Ions per day per student for high <br /> schools , He then did some research and got the actual flows from Sandwich <br /> High School , which has a treatment plant , a swimming pool and is used as a <br /> community center , <br /> 1993- actual flows were 6 . 1 gal per person (students and staff ) <br /> 1994- 6 . 21 gall ons per person <br /> With full enrollment for Mashpee High Sehoo 1 , using 6 , 5 gal per day per <br /> person = 8 , 645 gal per day , not 26 , 000 per day that is being used for <br /> design of the plant. <br /> plant with less than 500//0 of capacity flow will not operate . <br /> Under current title V regulations , less than 15 , 000 gal per day does not <br /> require a treatment p 1 ant <br /> Perhaps downsizing t#ie plant to 14, 000 gallons would be an option . <br /> Flows from the Coombs school 680 students x 15 gallons per day = 1 0 , coo <br /> per day . The actual flows are 4 . 17 gal per day per student 1 /3 of <br /> estimated . <br /> Elias suggested the Committee downsize the plant or appeal to the State to <br /> allow a Title V systerr). The appeal shOL11 d come -f=rom the town , not the <br /> architects o1 e g i I Ise rs a <br /> Greg Taylor had an off the record conversation with DEP . Greg ' s opinion is <br /> the town should indicate the uniqueness of this facility a new high <br /> school with many new water- conservation aids . This facility will use less <br /> Ovate l� than most other high schools , He would encourage the town to maf;e ars <br /> attempt at an appeald <br /> We need to benefit from the Sandwich peril ( elementary schools ) . There is <br /> a clause that says "unless you can show otherwise'' . <br /> Peter asked Elias , 144" the State does not require the treatment plant, will <br /> the Board of Health mandate it? <br /> Elias said the Board of Health would prefer to see a treatment plant but if <br /> it is not required by the State they will not stand in the way . <br /> Dr . DeMoura noted the operational contract for the Sandwich treatment plant <br /> is about $40 , 000 per year . <br /> r <br /> Peter asked if people will oppose this route because this treatment is not <br /> as goad as a plant's <br /> Greg ,said if this land had been put to its res i dent i a l use , you could show <br /> what would have been generated from it' s single family res i dent i a l use ,, The <br /> school will be less than the residential use . <br /> Pau 1 made a motion to request the Selectmen seek a waiver from the <br /> State to allow for a Title V system, as opposed to sewage treatment <br /> plant at the high schoo1 . Merry Sue seconded the motion . All <br /> members were in favor . ** <br /> Ian said they found the same to be true at Nauset Regional high school , <br /> flows were 112 of esti mated k <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.