My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/30/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
8/30/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:15:06 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:09:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/30/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fits in with the community . <br /> They don ' t envision a "totally" sloped roof for this project . <br /> Dr . DeMou r a said the pitch i s se little that it is basically a. <br /> flat roof . He 1�Mows money is a problem but he sees m,-�i i ntenance as <br /> a nightmare . Most of the building i s flat roofs , <br /> Paul said there is a consensus that the sections that are pitched <br /> are acceptable . There is a divided Committee on the flat areas, <br /> There are still major concerns about flat roofs <br /> Ray said to keep on schedule they have to Deep moving forward and <br /> have to keep drawing . with approval of this scheme � they can <br /> keep going forward and will come back to the Committee with <br /> details Qf the roofs to prove. to the Committee they w i 1 1 work . <br /> If they have to re-study the architecture it holds up moving <br /> forward <br /> Paul said the schedule doesn ' t mean anything if the Committee is <br /> not happy with the scheme . Are there any o Cher alternatives? Can <br /> we find another way to deal with it? <br /> Ed said it is their obligation to convince the Committee that <br /> they have a roo-11" , roof edger an r;jnoff rna.nage?-neat system to <br /> satisfy the Cemml ttee ' s needs . <br /> Janice would like to see a shed r e f , she does not want the water <br /> runoff depending on a pipe in the middle of the roof . <br /> Peter asked if the flat roof was for cosi.-., ,-)r for aest.het i cs <br /> Ray said both . He agrees t�,lat he does not want to mrove forward <br /> unless the Committee j s� happy with the s chlelme . <br /> Pe l.e r polled the Committee <br /> Paul -- flat roofs are potentially a problem. Arcli i tectu ral l y he <br /> likes i t bU t is concerned about long term maintenance of the f 1 at <br /> areas . <br /> Michael : has no problem with it. <br /> Joe : does not like the roofs , because they are net p-i tehed . <br /> Merry sue likes it. <br /> Janice agrees with Paul , Flat roofs worry her . There is rarely a <br /> School Committee meeting where they don ' t have to to 1 k about roof <br /> problems . <br /> Bill 18 concerned about the flat roof . He would like to see the <br /> cafeteria area in more detail . <br /> Joan said personally she has had back luck with flat reefs . More <br /> pitch would make her more comfortable , <br /> Bill Hauck suggested they come up with a mid- way pitch of 1 /2 <br /> instead of 1 /8 . He likes imerier drains because they won ' t <br /> freeze up and won ' t run off on the face of the building . <br /> Peter said Nantucket had a flat roof and asked hew it is work! ng� <br /> Ed said it was f i n i Shed 4 year ago; they have had nf) orrip i ai nts . <br /> Peter said 7 t seems the Committee ' s con+le rns are not aesthetics <br /> but funet i orl . <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.