My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/20/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
9/20/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:15:52 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:11:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/20/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT <br /> Mark Pare of DeEao wait and Pare was present to discuss the options and <br /> costs for the sewage treatment plant. <br /> Mark Pare said, based on feedback he has received , he must have done a <br /> lousy Job discussing the issues the last time he met with the Committee and <br /> hopes to address those concerns better today . He is attempting to work on <br /> the Town 's behalf but maybe be he misunderstood the Committee's priorities, <br /> He thought that because the site is very sensitive, the design would <br /> receive intense sorutiny and time was very important; there is a deadline <br /> to meet. He assumed these were his priorities, Alternatives were never <br /> discussed. T f he mi s u nde rstood his directive and cost i s the overriding <br /> factor, he needs to know that. <br /> He has received the notes from the Town's meeting with DEP. <br /> Peter asked how he feels, personally, about asking for a waiver from DEP' <br /> Mark said he has no problem asking for a waiver for flow, provided the <br /> system i s designed to provide the quality of effluent expected . <br /> Peter said data shows flows at other schools, similar to this one, don 't <br /> exceed 8, 000 gallons per day put Title V requires two times that. He asked <br /> M r.Pare i H he has any personal reasons for the Town to build to Title V <br /> standards? <br /> M r. Pare said he does not have personal reasons. Technically , you can' t <br /> design the plant basad only on a study of flows, you need to look at the <br /> concentration also. He also received data from some schools and the recent <br /> vintage schools do have reduced flows but as he suspected the <br /> concentrations are going up. The oak Ridge school in Sandwich , the <br /> concentrations were very high. <br /> He presented handout material on costs associated with a 12 ,000 gal . plant <br /> and a 24, 000 gal . plant. There is a $100,000 cost difference, Re also <br /> presented a letter from John Ryan of Clearwater Resources estimating a <br /> $75 , 000 cost difference between the two plants, based upon his experience. <br /> George Costa asked what they plan on building for that money's Fields Point <br /> built a plant that he does not think was even in this neighborhood of <br /> oasts. why not consider a package treatment plant's <br /> Merry sue said her concern is will it run efficiently with only 400 <br /> students in the school? will maintenance be more difficult running the <br /> plants with substantially lower flows than it was designed fo r'7 <br /> Mark said he received the data from the sandwich plants and they meet the <br /> permit,, <br /> George explained it i s not a violation problem it i s a flow problem they <br /> are having . There is not enough volume. A package plant can be built for <br /> $200-300,000 . <br /> Peter said DEP will not allow a Eioclear system. <br /> Mark Pare said there is not the economies of scale people may think there <br /> is in downsizing the plant* <br /> George said we want the water to come out clean, the technology is out <br /> there , $800 , 000 is a lot of money , <br /> Will it work with reduced flows? <br /> Mark said it will . That is the reason they picked this technology because <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.