My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/4/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
10/4/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:17:14 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:13:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/04/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Paul will meet with s A when they are ready. He suggests using magnetic <br /> holders on the doors, they won 't open unless a fire alarm goes off. A <br /> flexible system should be put in and the school administration can do what <br /> they want with it. <br /> suggested designing as manual a system as possible, so i t i 1 wads <br /> Steve su�� <br /> operable, to be added to the contract, who will write the <br /> 10. Telephone system: has <br /> specs is another question. <br /> SMMA is not doing the specs. Bob said the <br /> School l Dept* usually makes that decisions <br /> Michael Pare said it has to be set up properlyp <br /> The committee will have to decide who will do the phone system specs . <br /> Peter read from a letter <br /> sent to him from John Childs outlining the <br /> ser provides ices he will He does not get into much design of the system <br /> in this phase# <br /> Mi chae l said it is the same lousy scope of work from the beginningIR <br /> 10 i a lot of money for that amount of work,. <br /> Paul explained SMMA s original submission used BB&K as technology <br /> consultant but It was then shifted to Childs. Childs scope of works seems <br /> mush different rent from BB & ' s - they were more technical , Because of the <br /> e fallen en th rou h the cracks and a solution will <br /> shift, some issues may hav g <br /> have to be developed& <br /> Steve said a consultant is needed to write the specs. <br /> Michael said he wrote <br /> ' a document outlining what was expected from the <br /> technology consultant. <br /> aul said that document falls short because is does not address the <br /> tin that the School Department needs. Michael says <br /> educational consulting g <br /> ilds is riced but these are the architect's consultant choices, It <br /> ch p <br /> is clear from h i sconversations <br /> with Dr, Deou ra that his overall view for <br /> is ima not substance - he said himself he needs <br /> using computers g a <br /> ass i stance <br /> to o with Childs for this phase, he i s on <br /> Peter said the committee has g <br /> board but he may not be capable of step 2 wor . <br /> said he has i n wr i ti ng , asked Childs for references and resumes of <br /> Michael say a <br /> is staff and has not received thea. He has done some investigation and <br /> hi <br /> ` <br /> ed ex e r�i ease limited capabilities, has a habit <br /> heard that Childs has 1C1' 1t p <br /> of causing financial overrun <br /> s2 doesn 't listen to the people in the school , <br /> se a h} He has only been in business for years. <br /> has a cookie cutter pproar <br /> He did not hear too many good things. <br /> stayon but the ommittee should get more out of this <br /> He agrees Childs must <br /> first stages <br /> Paul will work on i ron i n g this out with sh A. <br /> 11 , computer <br /> system cabling and termination added to the contract: yes put <br /> • consultant presentlyava' 1 abl e to provide any <br /> them i n, `here i s not a <br /> information . <br /> Steve does not want this to stunt the , ob <br /> 12 . Xill <br /> wo r i n sc i ern ce and computer l abs - same as number 4. Bob w 1 1 <br /> continue to work on i t. <br /> ud i to r i um sound system - M i c hae l said i n his opinion it is tots l 1 <br /> 19 . Ato i give the quality <br /> unacceptable, it doesn 't have the frequency response n g <br /> needed. It i s not capable of do l by or surround sound , Th I s spec came f rom <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.