10/25/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes

Home Browse Search

5 k f r it t MASHFEE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25 , 1994 SMT OFFICE , CAMBRIDGE Members Present: Merry Sue Ahlgren, Janice Mil1s, Bill Ma rt i ros, Joe Polito, Paul Griffin Also Present: Bob Fournier, Ray Bordwe 1 l # Ed F renette, Phil Rene 1 l i , Torn Wren, Dan So l i en, representatives from SMMA structural , mechanical , electrical departments, Daedalus MINUTES Merry Sue made a motion to approve the minutes of October 18, J oe seconded the motion. Bob had a few comments: bottom pg . 7 Bob suggested concrete pavers for the courtyard, not stone. Rizzo, Woodard and Curren and Weston and Sampson . P91 9 All members were in favor of the minutes as amended To deep this meeting on track,act Paul asked everyone to agree to limit any one person s discussion on of an issue to 2 minutes and total discussion for � an issue to 10 minutes. If an agreement cannot be reached in that time, the slue i 1 l ut to the end of the meeting. Everyone ag reed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CONSULTANT PROPOSAL ' e l ai ned the received a letter from DeFeo wait and Rare and Bob Fournier p agreement theireeve nt with SMMA. Bob would like their are willing to terminate � the committee to formally vote to ask DeFeo wait and Fare to terminate their agreement with SMMA. Gooch cause is the only clear reasons to s a 'd al thou h there was some dissatisfaction terminate a contract and Bob � on the part of the Committee, it is not clearly cause* to request the agreement between DeFeo Wait � Janice made a motion � and Fare and S mores Ma i n i and McKee be terminated, Merry Sue seconded the motion. Discussion .- Paul iscussionPaul ased the motion be amended to say it is a non binding Grote by the Committee ee because they don 't have any legal right to terminate a contract. Janice amended the motion to ask the agreement be term i Hated but this is a non binding vote of the Committee, Merry Sue seconded the motion. Committee i ttee a reed to discuss SMMA' s proposal for a new consultant before The g voting on this motion . !dates to submit proposals: R i zo, Woodard and Curran invited nvited S sand and Weston and Sampson . Woodard and Curran and Weston and Sampson attended a mee t i n i th SMMA, at the of f ice of DWR to rear i ew the o r k they had x completed to date. Based on review of the proposals and the fee proposals presented, SMMA is Woodard and cur~ran . Bobadded that t i recommending me is of the essence BEP legally can take up to 1 year to approve the plant. ' He said there is no more impact to the project schedule then if the 1