My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/1/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
11/1/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:20:49 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:18:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/01/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
37 , <br /> r <br /> p , 4 additional recommendat i ons. <br /> . <br /> 3, <br /> 4. <br /> 5 , Where are these windows . Ed said they have not chosen specific 1athey <br /> feel they can get it down by 1 ; <br /> 5 . l <br /> 7 , r <br /> The Committee went back and discussed Lrh a number ores r <br /> 4, Bob said the can save $9 , 000 but it won' t be fabric acoustical p ane l s ol <br /> The Committee agreed% <br /> 12 . same thing in the gym. Committee agreed . <br /> 16 , From GWB to acoustical tile ground floor and second floor lobby . <br /> Committee ag reed. <br /> 18 Ed said they can save half of that associated savings. committee agreed <br /> . <br /> for a 6, 000 savings. <br /> 20 <br /> Is a design issue. said the committee can obligate them to save 12 <br /> of this amount <br /> Merry Sue is concerned about effect on design . <br /> 21 . committee agreed , take the whole amount. <br /> This i ve s 1 i h t to the interior classrooms . committee does not <br /> 21a, Th g <br /> agree. <br /> s going n to review this, The committee has already read' taken a <br /> �1 � . �$40 , 000a� a � � <br /> sav i n s, <br /> Anything more removes any design potentia 1 and ob li gates <br /> g <br /> industrial type lighting . <br /> . Change to a 3 . <br /> P9, 4 `lr Cafeteria r �roof slope . Ed said he would rather this Committee <br /> take this one and allow the skylights in the other corridor, There will <br /> still be natural light here, becomes a question of quantity <br /> Committee agreed to take it-9 <br /> . Paul thinks the committee should take it. <br /> Ed <br /> said he wou 1 1 i ke to investigate a block building in total . Because of <br /> the magnitude of the problem. He will try to provide places the committee <br /> can go to look at a block building . <br /> Paul said he recently saw a grey block building and it looked good. <br /> Ed <br /> said block has the potential for texture and color choices, patterns to <br /> break up the scale. <br /> They <br /> cannot take the $99 ,000 and 70 ,000 savings , There would be about <br /> $300 , 000 savings associated with a block building . <br /> Paul su e ted the committee take # and then look at the rest of the <br /> building* <br /> Ed would rather the Committee allow SMMA to prove they can make a good <br /> looking building with all block. <br /> Peter thinks the Committee should g o with the Architects recommendation , it <br /> could sage $300,00ON <br /> e rgoing out to bid , this core in low, what can we add <br /> Bill said if aft <br /> things back .? <br /> Paul said there is a b i g list of alternates . <br /> motion that the first. alternate (to be added back) i s <br /> Bill mad <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.