My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/29/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
11/29/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:23:02 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/29/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
keying system that should be abided by? Are the other two schools on a <br /> particular system they want to maintain? <br /> The Committee asked him to take this question directly to the <br /> Superintendent. <br /> SMMA received John Childs ' final version of his Technology Program <br /> Statement ( included) . <br /> Paul explained Childs' scope was to give direction of where technology is <br /> going to the Superintendent, to provide conduit and equipment locations so <br /> the architects can proceed with construction drawings . His scope did not <br /> include the final network. <br /> Paul recently spoke with Mr . Childs . He recommends an integrated system, <br /> it is the latest thing. He wouldn ' t put it in a commercial building but <br /> for simplicity , he recommends it for schools. It does not control the <br /> telephones . It does integrate the bells and clocks and could represent a <br /> $40 , 000 savings . <br /> John Childs says that he is qualified to do the next phase , Michael Pare <br /> does not think he is . <br /> Steve said this is a critical issue. The entire Committee should talk to a <br /> few candidates (for technology consultant) . To make the best decision for <br /> the school will be tough . <br /> Paul also talked to him about buying equipment at different times, what <br /> should be bought first. <br /> Steve said Continental Cable has agreed to put in 2 way nets in the school <br /> for nothing. There may be equipment in the other schools that should now <br /> be in the High School and the High School will be the primary feed . There <br /> are equipment requirements to look at. <br /> Phil Poinelli said he is also is impressed with Childs. <br /> Phil reviewed a layout of a typical classroom. <br /> The teachers work station has been put in a cabinet, with doors that swing <br /> up and in - out of the way . The print server is in the cabinet also as <br /> well as wiring to the 5 work stations along the wall . <br /> The work stations are on an open counter, with CPU down below, monitor and <br /> keyboard on top. An open shelf above the length of the wall . <br /> There is a full height lockable storage cabinet, a teachers work station , <br /> narrow teachers wardrobe , and an open shelf with a lockable cabinet below. <br /> This should provide maximum flexibility for storage. <br /> Steve asked Merry Sue how she felt about the computer in a cabinet an not <br /> on a desk? <br /> She doesn 't have a problem with it but it should probably be someplace else <br /> in the room (from what is shown on the plan) . Now, the desk it not fixed <br /> which gives flexibility. <br /> Steve said if the teachers computer is going to be interactive , it is at a <br /> wrong angle. For security , the teachers will have to learn how to maintain <br /> security of their computer. <br /> Phil suggested with this arrangement, the teachers computer could be used <br /> as another work station. <br /> It is in the wrong place to use it to work off of the video monitor. <br /> Phil said it is difficult to predict how any one person will teach so they <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.