Laserfiche WebLink
been so many changes . could they bring the next estimate forward - do It <br /> sooner rather than later? <br /> Phil said the accuracy of the estimate i s dependent on the accuracy of the <br /> drawings. There is a risk of less accuracy to the esti mate . <br /> Peter sa i d this overrun is 1 of the construction budget. Are we wasting <br /> time on this 1 <br /> Raul said it is not 1 , 1 t is really 6-7 , because of the value added and <br /> contingencies . <br /> Paul said this issue will be plat on the January 3rd agenda, For that <br /> meeting he would like SMMA to talk to Daedul us about their opinion on a <br /> estimate, any value added recommendations, and a really good opinion of <br /> where SMMA thinks we are with the budget. <br /> Ed said they will quantify minor~ items , recommend major items, recommend a <br /> value added list and find a way to validate the cost estimate. <br /> Submission of EIR, Potentia 1 Schedule Delay. <br /> Brian Lawlor , civil engineer has been dealing with the EIR and the various <br /> agencies . He reported to the Committee on the status of the EIR . <br /> He explained they are required to file with the cape cod Commission also <br /> and it will be a joint filing with the Commission and MEPA. He asked the <br /> Commission for guidance and received a very positive feeling from them. <br /> There seems to be a commitment from thea to help us with this project. <br /> Sharon Rooney offered to set up a meeting to go through the commission <br /> application and to keep it as close as possible to the EIR, That meeting <br /> will be this Thursday at 9 : 00 a.m. <br /> M r. Lawlor also spore with MEPA who are very pleased about that meeting and <br /> they will contact the commission to make there clear about the scope of the <br /> EIR. He feels there has been a positive change in attitude . <br /> Where that leaves the filing of the EIR: <br /> M r. Lawlor expected to file the E I R with MEPP on December 15th . He <br /> believes it would be unwise to file it on the 15th and not tape advantage <br /> of a consultation with the ccc first. The joint filing gives the <br /> Commission the right to define the product. He feels strongly about <br /> meeting with thea before filing the EIR. <br /> Merry sue asked what that does to our filing goal ? <br /> He said he will file it within the next 2 week period, i f all goes as <br /> planned and he assumes it will . That war the cc w i l l have oppo rtun i t fon <br /> input. <br /> Steve asked if the committee/Town should have representation at the <br /> meeting? <br /> Raul has no problem with someone attending , he cannot. Peter cannot, <br /> M r. Lawlor asked Sharon Rooney who should attend. she did not feel it <br /> necessary for the owner to attend and asked that he not bring a team of <br /> consultants . <br /> Greg Taylor said he plans on going. <br /> Peter asked about the letter form Armando Carbonell stating this project <br /> must result in no net addition of nitrates to the aquifer, are they backing <br /> cuff of that? <br /> M r, Lawlor said he will explain to them how we would mitigate th e <br /> Situation . There is no way to reduce the level to zero. <br /> 4 <br />