My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/16/1995 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
5/16/1995 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2018 5:06:55 PM
Creation date
8/20/2018 1:11:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/16/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
what might be saved by adding the motion sensors . <br /> i3 * No <br /> Joel explained the curtains in the auditorium were never cut . <br /> OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS <br /> Joel explained phase II was approved , phase I is pending final <br /> resolution, <br /> Paul explained that is because town counsel feels it is within <br /> SMMA' s scope of work because it is within the site , including any <br /> work to get into the sites <br /> Joel said SMMA would like to discuss that with Paul . They can' t <br /> authorize the consultant to proceed until theno <br /> Paul said if they have not authorized the consultant to proceed <br /> with this work he will be VERY ANGRYt. . SMMA should do the job$ <br /> Have the consultant do the work and they can dispute the money <br /> afterwardsSMMA must fulfill their contract or Paul will hold <br /> up their payment . Paul told Joel he should pass this message on. <br /> Be has been more than fair, but if SMMA pushes him he will push <br /> back e <br /> PEER REVIEW <br /> Tom said it is Chartwell ' s opinion after spot checking , there is <br /> nothing more to be done by the Building committee at this time . <br /> Everything raised by the peer review team was taken care of by <br /> the bid drawings , <br /> FUTURE FIELDS <br /> It had been requested that SMMA provide cost details . Paul had a <br /> conference call on this issue and the cost of moving the fill was <br /> not to our advantage . This item will be held opera until they <br /> receive a, schedule of values from the contractor* <br /> Steve said the contractor cannot remove any fill from the town <br /> without the approval from the town. <br /> SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT DISCHARGE PERMIT <br /> T town put ut an add in today' s paper. They will fax it to BEP <br /> tomorrow and that will start the 35 day comment period. After <br /> that DEP will issue the discharge permit . <br /> Steve said the town may have to issue a discharge permit a.lsoo <br /> Paul said the town issued a temporary waiver so they could issue <br /> the Building Permit . <br /> OPERATING COST ANALYSIS <br /> ,Joel said they were surprised to see this on the agenda. SMMA <br /> has performed operating cost analysis as asked for throughout the <br /> 'off <br /> Paul said NO - SMMA s scope of work requires that once the ,doh <br /> was completed they would do an analysis of the cost of operating <br /> the building including the grounds - a. one time analysis . <br /> This was brought up many times before and SMMA said it should be <br /> done at the end of the project f <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.