My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/1995 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
7/11/1995 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2018 5:09:06 PM
Creation date
8/20/2018 1:32:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Jim said once the CPM is accepted , if the Contractor falls more <br /> than 10% behind , the specs say the Comm.itt�e can tell the <br /> contractor what to do to catch up . Peter said this CPNI becomes <br /> part of the contract <br /> Yes it does . <br /> Peter said, if the contractor falls behind) he has to catch UP at <br /> his expense? <br /> Yes he does , <br /> Paul said it is important to agree with all these line items now , <br /> so they have that leverage when he is falling behind . <br /> Peter asked if the schedule is sho,winis time to move into the <br /> building? <br /> Joel explained some categories meed to be added , FF&E move i.n� <br /> end testings for example •1 store must add those to the CPMb <br /> Paul said he feels the contractor is still slipping from the <br /> schedule <br /> Jim said they have pla.eed an average of feet o f foot ing per <br /> day. 2 weeks ago they said they would be do i.ng 250 ft per day. <br /> Paul would like SMMA to send a letter to Stone notifying them the <br /> Committee feels they are fall inIn <br /> n behind schedule . he wants to be <br /> on record that the Committee knows they are falling behind . <br /> FF & <br /> Joel presented a letter to the Committee from Ed Frenette <br /> regarding the technology consultant . sMMA is prepared to <br /> recommend CCR for the final phase of technology consulting , <br /> Paul explained he received a fax from John Brooks. ,( a.s did SK-,MA <br /> and Dr . DeMoura, ) . Mr Brooks felt there were at a. disadvantage , <br /> felt SMMA was acai.nst them and certain figures in the town of <br /> astrP ee were against hini. Paul said the letter sounded hostile , <br /> He felt the Commit-tee told him up front they wouldn ' t have <br /> invited him i f they were not serious $ <br /> Paul said the Committee can accept the recommendation of CCR or <br /> ask sMMA to invite someone elsel, The field is rather new and he <br /> knows of only 1 other firm to possibly invite and he is not sure <br /> they could do the entire job,, <br /> Janice said CGR was really enhanced by hooking up with MEC4, <br /> Paul agreed . Before the me e t i ne he had concerns about CCR. He <br /> was impressed with them after the interviews , especially with <br /> Carol of MEC. Paul said Fd Frene tte also now feels good about <br /> CCR. They are trying to build a. reputation in this market , they <br /> are hu ga.ry , <br /> Steve said MEC has been around for awhile and during the last few <br /> years they have specialized in education training/software He <br /> thinks the Committee has the best combination ( CCR and MEC ) that <br /> exists now. <br /> Janice said she is concerned about the furniture timeline , The <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.