Laserfiche WebLink
Merry SUe said so mangy. of those meetings were about/ because of <br /> the bud.aet . The Committee kept meet inc' to try to solve that <br /> -issue - the overwhel ini ng budget issue i t tin ' over our heads . we <br /> were tryin3 to c1le t back to the bLidae t . The additional value <br /> eM i. eerie ' ��as e.cause we were cutting ! MMA did design work, <br /> thea the hudget estimate would show we couldn' t afford i t . To <br /> aet a, reasonable looking block des igtn took a. .number of hc)urs h-Lit <br /> it was because of the budget estimates which said we COUIdn' t <br /> afford brick_. That. is her op-Inion on why they kept talking about <br /> issues over and over again . <br /> Tae agreed , they were ta+l.kina about dollars , not design,, <br /> Steve asked , durina the o r is i.na.i. contract negotiations , did they <br /> discuss the a.ppropri��.te number} of meeti.na s <br /> Ed said SMMA presented a. full scale proposal. , and were told to <br /> Cut it <br /> Steve asked how they derived at whQ would attend which meetings . <br /> Joel reviewed all of the minutes , to some degree 'it is as <br /> ave ra&e . <br /> Ste- e as_.ked -'*Lf they do pro"ect time accounting .l <br /> Ed said. yes , they rete r-t every 9. week" . The�, have known this has <br /> been happening . <br /> Paul asked about meet i n-3 preparation and follow-tip , 6 hou�rs for <br /> each person for every meeting, . Sopie of these services they wOUld <br /> have bought already, SMMA would have had to do the. preparation <br /> anyway. The only extra time is for travel? <br /> Ed explained they added two hours getting here , 2 hours ge_t t .�.na <br /> back to the office and 4 hours for each meeting . These meetings <br /> were extras because they were goingover s inii l a.r` things a.lain-- <br /> %--"p <br /> repe�at . ._ Normal.l v- they would. build -a certain amount of redundancy <br /> 1ntO the fee s trLlC tare . <br /> Joe said they have to satisfy the client ., <br /> Ed said there w(as a constant fog+kis on cost , from the. start of the <br /> process 1 year ago . SM24A Produced value for the town. <br /> Joe agreed they produced value , but a, lot of this is grey. <br /> . Cape Cod Commission <br /> Paul said the proposal specifically excluded this F The Goinmittee <br /> always thought MEPA review would not he necessary <br /> Steve said i t is an anticipated unknown , the Committee. just needs <br /> documentation. <br /> 3 . Agency Approval. <br /> +' r Ed said there was no wav to anticipate the owner#-s - requirement e f <br /> an unperin i t t ed treatment. p l ant ., <br /> Steve thinks what they did go throu.dh with DEP was rather smooth , <br /> From -ha.s e�tiper.ience . He thQUdht DEP was a.cecmmoda.t ink` . <br /> Ja,nic e said -the C rrmittie immediately ( after hirink SMMA ) talked <br /> about other systems that-I were ax-er built and didn ' t. work . The <br /> Committee was sear hi n& , -%I-ery early on, for alternatives , Tt <br /> shouldn' t have come as a, b i c shock <br /> 3 <br />