Laserfiche WebLink
** Vote on the motion to not recommend trailers: 6 members <br /> in favor 1 against ( ( Steve ) . <br /> (Peter Dinizio left the meeting ) <br /> FIELDS <br /> Joel explained there was a meeting with Dan Solien, Tom, Jim, <br /> Alan Scott and the irrigation sub contractor to discuss the <br /> condition of the fields . Because the fields were finished late <br /> and no corrective work has been done, they did not fertilize and <br /> they were not irrigated,they have deteriorated. Dan has prepared <br /> a 10 part recommendation. Stone has concurred they would perform <br /> these tasks . The irrigation system and well will not be done <br /> until August. Stone will have to water with temporary water. <br /> They are to split seed the fields by June 15th. There has been <br /> no activity on this . There have been rumors that Stone does not <br /> intend to provide water but this has to be confirmed. <br /> Steve said Stone made a commitment last year they would water and <br /> they never did. <br /> Paul asked if the fields fail , is there any reason we can't make <br /> them sod it? <br /> Joel, explained Dan Solien said sod is not the way to go for <br /> athletic fields . <br /> We should, and can, pursue re-claiming money appropriated for the <br /> fields , now that they are deteriorated. <br /> Joel asked if we should pursue an extended maintenance period <br /> with Stone , since the job will be finished August 23rd and they <br /> are only re--seeding now? <br /> Paul asked SMMA to review Stone ' s obligation regarding the fields <br /> and notify them of how we interpret it - if they re-seed the <br /> clock starts again. <br /> Steve said this is too big an item for the school department , <br /> once they own the building. It has to be done correctly. <br /> Jim suggested taking the money back, put a dollar value on it. <br /> Paul is concerned with that approach because it may get deleted <br /> from the project and then becomes and expense to the school <br /> system. We may want Stone to give us a bond. <br /> Impact of infiltration of Water into the Building : <br /> Joel explained he had a concern about mold in some areas and <br /> wanted it tested. He wants to know what has to be done so <br /> direction can be issued to Stone for work they must perform and <br /> also monitor that performance . The firm was here on Friday and <br /> Monday for initial findings . They found a substantial amount of <br /> mold, water damage and high humidity in derrick 6 and a minimal <br /> amount in derricks 1 & 2 . <br /> The proposal by OccuHealth is to do an analysis of the <br /> conditions , provide a remedial action plan and provide <br /> monitoring . <br /> 5 <br />