My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/4/1996 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
3/4/1996 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2018 5:04:08 PM
Creation date
8/20/2018 2:00:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/04/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE <br /> MONDAY, MARCH 4 , 1996 <br /> HIGH SCHOOL SITE <br /> Present; Paul. Griffin, Merry Sue Ahlgren, Joe Polito, Bill Martiros, Peter <br /> Dinizio , Janice Mills, Steve Greelish <br /> Tan Aitchison, Tom Wren, Jim Byrne , Joel Seeley, John Williams , Mike <br /> Pietrowski , Dr. Lincoln DeMoura <br /> MINUTES <br /> Merry Sue made a motion to approve the minutes of February 12 , <br /> 1996 . Joe seconded the motion. All members were in favor 5 <br /> Paul discussed with the Committee what transpired at Friday' s meeting with <br /> the bonding company and their attorney, Stone and their attorney and the <br /> town with town counsel . <br /> He does not think we walked away with too much. We have all the risk and <br /> they have 2 more weeks . Stone must submit a new schedule by Friday. <br /> The President of Stone promised Jim Vacarro by the middle of this month <br /> they would load up the job with men and overtime . <br /> Merry Sue asked, if we don't pull the bond now, but in 1 month decide to, <br /> do we have to start the whole process again? <br /> Paul said no, but we have lost 1 month. <br /> Joe said in 2 weeks this Committee can say yes or no to continuing the <br /> default. process? <br /> Paul said if everyone agrees. There may be grey areas . What if Stone <br /> loads up the job and we see corrections to the defects? Maybe we 'll give <br /> them more leeway. <br /> Joe has not seen much progress from last week to this week. They could <br /> have gotten a lot done but is doesn' t seem to be happening. What else can <br /> we do? <br /> Paul said there is always a risk to pulling the bond prematurely. <br /> He is going to investigate a job that Stone is working on, Andover High <br /> School , that is having very similar problems . He is going to talk with <br /> their Clerk. <br /> If we cancel Stone ' s contract, they will go immediately to court . We can <br /> allow it to go to arbitration but if it does not, it could be a delay of a <br /> few months. If we let Stone go to the end of the job, then find out they <br /> are not going to make the completion date, we have to provide housing for <br /> the students and then seek to recover the costs -- sue them. <br /> The bonding company failed to step in. They feel Stone has somewhat of a <br /> case. We feel the bonding co. had not read the case file in detail . He <br /> asked for a weekly update from SMMA. He obviously did not read the letter <br /> from Pat Costello (town counsel ) . Liberty sent a letter to Pat Costello <br /> almost exactly the same as Stone' s attorney' s letter. Liberty did not even <br /> mention the clause in the contract in dispute, he had not read the <br /> contract. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.