Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Isbitz referenced last night's Board of Selectmen meeting, noting that the Planning Board <br /> and Mashpee Commons were tasked with coming together on an approach to which both parties could <br /> agree, by September 11. The Chair stated that they would be seeking as many affordable housing units <br /> that could feasibly be developed, as it was needed by the Town. The Chair stated that he looked <br /> forward to hearing a favorable response from the parties involved and hoped that the Committee would <br /> be kept informed. <br /> Mr. Abbott inquired why 15% was identified and Ms. Waygan responded that current 40B projects <br /> required 25% affordable. Mashpee Commons was expected to request over 40 residential units per <br /> acre and up to 5-storics high, with some areas of conservation. The Planning Board had not yet seen a <br /> master regulatory plan that would identify the blocks. Ms. Waygan stated that Mashpee Commons <br /> was seeking high density and height, approximately two times its existing development. Mr. Abbott <br /> inquired whether there was flexibility in the 15%and Ms. Waygan responded that she thought it was <br /> reasonable and that some towns requested 20% and the Cape Cod Commission required 10%. The <br /> Planning Board had also asked for a 1:1 acre for acre set aside for open space. <br /> The Chair again echoed his hope that the two parties could work out an agreement amenable to all. <br /> Mr. Johnson inquired whether the units'would be rentals and Ms. Waygan responded that she was <br /> unsure, as they just received the Mashpee Commons proposal on June 20. Mr. Johnson expressed <br /> concern about association fees and differences for market versus affordable housing when the units <br /> were mixed, though felt it was generally preferable. There was consensus that the immediate need was <br /> for affordable rentals. There was discussion regarding affordable counts related to household income <br /> levels. Ms. Waygan noted that some affordable housing developers such as Stratford Capital, <br /> Commonwealth Community Developers and Dakota Partners were looking at the Cape for <br /> development opportunities. <br /> Main Street Village, Phase I-There was no further information regarding the issues presented <br /> by the development. The Chair wished to defer it to another meeting to follow up with Gale Kelleher. <br /> Main Street Village, Phase II Proposal-Mr. Lehrer reported that another developer had <br /> approached him recently who considered building all rental units, selling or deeding them to the <br /> Mashpee Housing Authority. Mr. Lehrer added that, according to the Building Commissioner, Phase I <br /> still had some incomplete items on their Special Permit but questioned whether a new developer could <br /> be burdened by the previous developer. <br /> 243 Cotuit Road Proposal-No progress. <br /> HAC Affordable Housing Projects in Mashpee-The Chair reported that a meeting had been <br /> held with the Town Planner and the Housing Assistance Corporation, with David Quinn and Sandy <br /> Horvitz. A new program was being developed that would target 25-30 existing seasonally <br /> rented/weekly rental homes, convincing homeowners to rent with one-year leases to increase the <br /> housing stock for year-round residents. The financial feasibility and approach were currently being <br /> considered, before launching the program. The goal was to convince homeowners that it was <br /> financially more feasible to rent annually, rather than seasonally. Once ready to launch, they will <br /> present their ideas to the Affordable Housing Committee and other towns. The Chair noted that the <br /> State was pursuing an additional tax on AirBNB rental homes, taxing them at the same rate as a hotel. <br /> Mr. Johnson suggested that it would likely depend upon the location of the home. Ms. Stone inquired <br /> about the impact to the local population of J-1 seasonal student rentals. <br /> 4 <br />