Laserfiche WebLink
inquired about the increased traffic traveling through Falmouth. lam-. D. Barrett stated that the <br /> tonnage would likely come from what was tipped at Bourne. <br /> Ms. Laurent inquired about the Yarmouth RFP and Toni Cipolla of SEMASS responded that <br /> { <br /> nothing had been signed and that discussions with SENIASS were ongoing. It was expected that <br /> the term would be at least 5 years. Mr. Tilton inquired about SEMASS discussions with SWAG <br /> and Mr. Cipolla responded that the exclusive negotiation was in process and that progress was <br /> being made. Its. Laurent reported that.Patty Daley planned to present the results of discussion <br /> by the beginning of February. Mr. 'Tilton agreed with Mr. Jack that the Cape Cod Commission <br /> pursue further research into recycling. There was discussion suggesting that haulers owned the <br /> recycling commodity so it did not make sense to build a facility and the possibility of <br /> consolidating recycling for multiple communities. Mr. Jack emphasized that opportunities <br /> needed to be considered in order to identify the hest option for the future of the UC T . Mr. <br /> Jack stated that the facility featured the rail which could be a deal breaker when the market <br /> charged. <br /> Mr. Cavossa again extended his offer. Mr. Cavossa also stated that Falmouth would be signing <br /> an agreement with Bourne, creating a situation whereby Falmouth would not be able to penalize <br /> haulers for transporting their waste elsewhere. Mr. Cavossa indicated that the shortfall was <br /> likely to then get gorse over the next 2 yearn which could be resolved with a public/private <br /> relationship. Mr. Cavossa stated that he had a good relationship nth the rail and would be able <br /> to fulfill the tonnage requirement. Mr. Podgurski inquired about the amount of C&D generated <br /> on the Cape and suggested the possibility of using the UCRT . The Chair expressed concern <br /> about the ability to load both C&D and solid waste. Mr. Podgurski suggested that it could solve <br /> the economic issues. 11r. Cavossa suggested that currently, there would be challenges due to <br /> l i mited rail cars and space, but that there could be a future. Where was discussion regarding the <br /> end facility for D. <br /> OTHERBUSINESS <br /> Discussion of Future.Agenda <br /> As discussed previously <br /> INE XT MIEEMG <br /> Wednesday, February 13, 2013 at 8 a.m. <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> Mr. Tilton made a-motion to adjourn. Mr. D.Barrett seconded the motion. -The meeting <br /> adjourned at :17 a.rn. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Jennifer M. C111rd <br /> Board Secretary <br /> LIST of DOCUMENT <br /> -December 2012 Summary of Tonnage <br /> 4 <br />