My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2013 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
>
11/13/2013 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2018 5:12:18 PM
Creation date
9/12/2018 2:55:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that as waste became less available,, the cost may off-set the pricing. Mr. O'Connor inquired <br /> whether a study had been completed on Cape and whether there was enough volume to sustain the <br /> facility. Mr. Cavossa suggested that the communities not tale the risk and allow a private entity to <br /> tale the risk white the Board continued to oversee the facility} in order to maintain the pricing. <br /> Mr. Jack pointed out that, once the IMA expired, the board and towns would choose whether to <br /> demolish or sell off the assets. Mr. Jack suggested the benefit to maintaining the availability of the <br /> facility in order to allow options for the future. Mr. Jack added that next month's meeting with Mr. <br /> ieira may open up an opportunity to pursue a Fant to identify future uses of the facility. Mr. <br /> a ossa referenced the IEP food waste regulations and the need to identify locations to dump or <br /> transfer the waste, when the law is enforced. Mr. o}Connor stated that DEP regulations require that <br /> food waste less than 1 ton per week would fall outside the bats, but haulers could then end up with <br /> 80% food waste in their true because it is an aggregate of 10% at the disposal facility. <br /> Where was further discussion regarding Falmouth's letter of withdrawal from the IMAL and whether <br /> that could be reversed, W. Jack stated that the letter was a legal requirement as they had signed a <br /> contract with Bourne, though Falmouth may still wish to be a participant and keep their options <br /> open. Mr. Jack questioned whether the letter represented a termination of the relationship. Mr. <br /> Wilton recommended greater clarification on the issue. <br /> 0IMR BUSINESS <br /> Discussion of Future Agenda <br /> Among the issues to be added to the next agenda: Mr. ieira's and Massachusetts"s DOT <br /> attendance at the next meeting <br /> NEXT MEED <br /> Wednesday,December 11, 2013at 8:00 a.m. <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> Mr. 'Pilton made a motion to adjourn. Mr. D. Barrett seconded the motion* The meeting <br /> adjourned at 9:03 a.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Y <br /> Jenn fer M. Clifford <br /> Board Secretary <br /> LIST of DOCUMENTS <br /> -September 2013 Summary of Tonnage <br /> -October 2013 Summary of Tonnage <br /> -Monthly SEMASS Report, September 2013 <br /> -Monthly SEMASS Report, October 2013 <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.