Laserfiche WebLink
There was agreement to issue the closure notices as discussed. Mr. Goddard recommended sending <br /> the letters certified nail. <br /> MOTION: Mr, Elliott made a motion to proceed with sending the closure notice to <br /> M ss oastal and the haulers. Mr. 'Wilton seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> Decision on ShortTerm Operation of UCRTS vs. Closure <br /> Mr. Cavossa stated that he had not received a phone call regarding UCRTS usage and inquired how <br /> it would continue to be used. The Chair noted that there was consideration keeping the facility open <br /> 2-3 hours per day if there was committed interest from haulers and if it was economically feasible. <br /> Mr. Cavossa expressed interestin keeping the superintendent employed while the UCRTS <br /> considered alternative uses, and with Cavossa paying a fee for their own disposal while supplying <br /> loading capability. Mr. l ac evin inquired about the economically feasible figure, lir. Cavossa <br /> recommended a weekly or monthly fee that would cover the operational costs of the facility. <br /> Board members were in agreement that, at this point, it was not worthwhile to continue to oversee <br /> the facility. Ms. Laurent indicated that costs would include salary, benefits,util ities and operational <br /> costs. Mr. Cavossa suggested that it would likely be more cost effective than hirn building his own <br /> facility. The Chair inquired whether Mr. Cavossa proposed that the facility would be open only to <br /> his own company and Mr. l acNevin responded that trash from other haulers could be accepted. <br /> Mr. Elliott inquired about who would then manage the facility and the Chair responded that it would <br /> be the Board of l nagers with an agreement that Cavossa would be paying 100% of the costs. Mr. <br /> Barrett suggested that it would not be simple as an RFP was necessary and the permit would need to <br /> be updated, and Falmouth may require compensation to accommodate extra trucking. Mr. Tilton <br /> was in agreement. heir. Barrett also pointed out potential liabilities requiring consideration as well. <br /> Tr. Cavossa stated that it was a practice that occurred nationwide and that insurance would address <br /> liability issues and emphasized his interest in protecting the supervisor's job and keeping the facility <br /> viable until an alternative use was determined. The Chair noted that there could be a benefit to <br /> having an active operation in place should a future alternative use be identified, rather than closing <br /> down the facility. her. Cavossa offered the example of private operation of h ashpee{s facil ity, and <br /> it was noted that.SEMASS operated the Braintree area.facility, <br /> The Board will follow up with.Town. Counsel regarding private usage and drafting an RFP to be <br /> considered at the December meeting. Mr. Baffett indicated that he would follow up with DEP <br /> regarding whether trash could be trucked out of the facility. <br /> Feasibility Study for Reuse of UCRTS-DLTA grant from CCC <br /> The Chair reported that she had submitted a letter on behalf of the Board, as discussed, for the <br /> CCC's DLT grant, The deadline for applications was the end of the week and an answer was <br /> expected prior to the December 10 meeting. Since the CCC recommended applying it was expected <br /> that the grant would be considered favorably. <br /> QIHERBUSINESS <br /> Passenger Rail Cars <br /> The Chair reported that the rail cars had been located on the property since June. MassCoastal has <br /> indicated that the cars belonged to the MBTA who had been directed by MassDOT to store the cars <br />