12/12/2013 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

�r installed and the old .one removed. Agent McManus referred to the Board of Health approval and recommended a negative detennination. No comment from the public. Motion: Mr. Shaw moved a negative determination, seconded by Mr. Sweet; vote unanimous. - 6:03 Lenore G. and George F. Travis, 66 Pimlico Pond Road. Proposal to demolish n existing structure, construct a new single family hone within same footprint, and upgrade septic,water, electric and natural gas utilities. NOI Resource Area: Buffer zone to inland bank associated-with MashpeefWakeby Pond Materials Submitted: Plan of 66 Pimlico Pond Road. Civil Environmental Engineering Flan dated 12/24/13. Jack Cauley, Civil Engineering, was present representing Lenore and George Travis. He explained the project was to demolish and re-construct a single family dwelling, upgrading of the sewerage disposal system, water, electric and natural gas. The rebuilding of the house will be lamer than the existing house and upland of the inland bankand pond resource areas. He stated that no portion of the new hone will be closer to the bank or waeby Pond than the existing home. The deck and patios will be the same or a greater distance from the pond and inland bank. All of the work and construction areas will be in the habitat that is previously altered. He said they will submit at a later date a mitigation plan for planting. The mitigation plan will be submitted in a timely manner. He said at this time they do not have a DEP 4 nor a response from Natural Heritage. Agent McManus lan said the IEP 4 came in today. He said Natural'Heritage has 30 dys to comment. Agent McManus clarifld the advertisement. He said in the ad the home is proposed to be in the same footprint but that is not the ease. This is a larger home, however, it is not encroaching on the inland bank, it is being drawn back. By the regulatory language and the performance standards; none of what is being proposed is going to affect the bis stability and wildlife habitat. This is pending the receipt of a landscape plan. Mr. McManus read the Board of Health comments. It was noted that the new structure will be a four bedroom hone and on the Board of Health comments it referred to a edrooxn which was a typo. The plan also depicts a 4 bedroom home. He noted nothing can be .approved until receipt of the letter from. Natural Heritage or the eonimi sioners can .pprove pending the letter from Natural Heritage. Mr. Cauley requested a continuance awaiting approval from Natural Heritage, and said he would submit a landscape plan. Motion: Mr. Shaw moved to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant until January 9 at 6.,0 3. Seconded by Mr. Sweet. vote unanimous. -o