Laserfiche WebLink
f - <br /> failure and the cost is high for this investment. He said once the stone work is done it will <br /> probably survive a storm evert. <br /> i The, gent commented he would rather see a soft solution. He said he didn't see any <br /> erosion on this property because they have a substantial salt marsh buffer. He said he <br /> didn't see how this would necessitate a hard armor situation. The Agent didn't see any <br /> evidence of erosion and questioned why such a drastic measure is being taken. He <br /> started a soft solution would work better here. He didn't see any threat to the home. <br /> IIIb. Borselli stated there has been some erosion here and there is a fear this is going t <br /> get worse and occur on a more frequent basis. He felt being proactive is a good thing s <br /> they don't have to comeback with an urgent situation. <br /> The Agent said he hasn't seen any compelling need for ar hard solution and would <br /> recommend a soft solution and if it is conditioned the right wary that would be the right <br /> approach. He felt the hard solution would adversely affect the salt marsh. The Agent <br /> recommended the application be denied. <br /> There was ar lengthy dis a si n on the hard solution s_ ar soft solution. <br /> There were no comments from the public. <br /> Motion: Mr. Shaw moved to Close and issue, seconded by Mr. sweet. Vote 4-3 with <br /> y Mr. McKay, Mr. Gurnee and Mr. Rogers voting in the negative. <br /> 6: 15 Mary T. Petersen (Applicant), 11 Compass Circle. Proposed replacement of six <br /> posts with sic " round pilings, hand dig two ' posts and construction of sic stairs t <br /> access existing pier. Nicholas J. Nairdn , Trustee. (Property owner). Continued from <br /> 10/9/2014. Agent discovered wetlands violation. <br /> FDA <br /> Resource Area: Mand Under Ocean, LSCSF, Coastal Bank to salt Marsh <br /> The Agent explained when he went out to do the inspection, he noticed there was <br /> violation that had taken plane with the clearing of vegetation right along the stretch of the <br /> coastal bank. He followed up with IIIb. Nard ne to let him know and sent out a notice of <br /> violation and Mr. Nard ne did respond. Mr. I and ne hired Hoxie Landscaping to conduct <br /> mitigation in accordance with our mitigation regulations and submitted a plan along with <br /> an associated narrative with a 3 year maintenance a plarn to make sure the mitigation takes <br /> hold and is successful. The Agent said he didn't want the hearing to rove forward until <br /> he received the narrative and the plan. He found the plea to be acceptable which will be <br /> implemented in the spring. The Agent said he withheld them roving forward with this <br /> dock application because of the existing unresolved violation issue. It has been resolved <br /> and now that we have received the information he recommended we go forward with the <br /> application. <br /> Matt Costar Cape and Islands Engineering, was representing the applicant. He explained f <br /> Mrs. Petersen was the previous property owner and sold to Mr. Nard ne and ars part of <br /> the purchase and sales agreement she was to complete a Chapter 91 licensing process <br /> for the existing pier. He said they are proposing to rake alteratidns to the pier to raise the <br /> J <br /> 4 <br /> .f <br /> { <br /> 5' <br />