12/11/2014 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Lotion: Mr. Shaw moved to continue the hearing to January 8, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. t the request of the applicant, seconded by Mr. Sweet. vote unanimous: 6-0. 6:03 Timothy and clary Jane Colton, 74 Bluff Avenue. Proposed replacement of existing deck with construction of screened porch. ICDA F sur 'Area: Buffer Zone to Lard subject to Coastal Stora Flog. Matt Costa, Cape and Islands Engineering was representing th applicants. He said the property is located in the flood zone and the proposal calls for replacement of the existing deck with a screened-in porch. The project meets the current performance standards as the project does not propose disturbance beyond any existing structural footprint. The Agent recommended a negative determination. No Comments from the public. Motion:n: Mr. shaver roved a negative determination, seconded by Mr. Sweet. vote unanimous: - . 6:06 Bayswater Seaside 11 LLC5.42 Coastline Drive. Proposed construction of single- family dwelling, swimming pool and landscaping. Continued from 911112014 to allover time for revised plans. NOI Resource Area: Buffer Zone to Coastal B nk/LSCSF/Coastal Beach. John Wadsworth was representing the applicant. Also present was Joe C lasuonne from Bayswater Development, and batt Creighton from BSC Group. Tara !Darden from the Woods Hole Group was unable to attend. Mr. Wadsworth orth suggested dealing with all four hearings at one time. Aletter was distributed from Briggs Engineering responding to the concern that there wasn't any direct potential information on the stability of the bank. The last paragraph stated that the structures will not destabilize the bank based n the existing soils and recommended construction techniques. It was decided, to y review each application individually. Mr. Wadsworth -reviewed the revised narrative submitted. Mr. Colasuonno addressed the vacant let which is part of the homeowners association and is an access to the water. The area will be used for trucks and machines. It Was noted that there will -be n _ septic systems associated with these houses as the area is already sewered. S The Agent stated the proposal meets the 50 foot setback. H also stated that more information needs to be submitted regarding the beach nourishment aspect and the homeowners' responsibility, as well as access to accommodate beach nourishment in the future when these lots are sold. lir. Clasunno said the beach nourishment will be nourishing on the easement created on Shore Drive West. The homeowners rake contributions for the nourishment. The easement is in perpetuity. Mr. Sweet wanted t make sure the conditions of nouri.shm nt are attached to the deeds. It was explained there are two gays to accomplish the beach nourishment. One is the easement that Tidewatch uses on New S abury's property and the newly created easement from Shore Drive West. Matt Creighton reviewed the mitigation plantings proposed.