Laserfiche WebLink
89 Industrial Drive . Committee Comments continued <br /> Conservation <br /> Recommends ends leaving 5-6 inches of space at bottom of fencing for wildlife passage. <br /> DPW <br /> • bleed provision for recycling. They recycle metals inside building, but need recycle bin for <br /> cardboard, etc. <br /> • Recommends s Applicant consider some sort of curbing at current entrance., Piaui said all new <br /> curbing proposed but he thinks they can do curbing to existing entrance as recommended. <br /> Planning <br /> • Above-ground solid concrete forebay needed. <br /> Audience Comment <br /> John Fish — Property abuts 89 Industrial Drive <br /> Mr. Fish addressed the Board with his plea that this application for an auto body shop not be <br /> approved. He said let thea go whore there is no residential area. He said he just arrived and would <br /> have been at this meeting sooner, but he thought the Public Hearing was for tomorrow night. <br /> Garage will be abutting his property probably about 0% of it. <br /> This will impact value of his property, as well as his health and the health of his children and <br /> grandchildren. <br /> He haspetition of almost 65 people ...� all up ire arras over this. <br /> This industrial property is right up against residential property. <br /> Ventilation fans constantly brew down. <br /> He noted severity of having chemicals so close to residential neighborhood. He said he has <br /> chickens and a garden that will also be impacted by this, <br /> Mr. Fish said he has owned his property for 15 years and never had paperwork about ghat <br /> was going on near his property. <br /> Mr. Fish said in his neighborhood thea are over 17 lots, if not more. He said put auto body <br /> shop someplace away from residential property. <br /> 1r. Fish said when he came to Mashpee from Falmouth it was like a slice of heaven. <br /> llMr .T. Perry nighb _r <br /> Mary T. Perry said this matter wasn't brought to homeowner's attention. She said it was Mr. Fish who <br /> brought it to our attention. she questioned why she received no notification. <br /> The Board explained that this meeting is not a public hearing this is just an advisory board. It was <br /> explained that the Zoning Board of Appeals would advertise the Public Hearing, and that the Public <br /> Hearing on this application is to be held tomorrow night. As to notification, the laver requires <br /> notification be sent to these within Soo feet. <br /> 3 <br />