6/4/2014 PLANNING BOARD Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

rl Knhpee Planning Board Minutes of Meeting June 4,2014 at 7:00 p.m. aquoit Meeting ing Room, Mashpee Town Hall Planning Board Members Preswe Chairrn n George Petersen., May Waygan, Dennis B lzarini, David Kooharian, Joe Comings Also Present: Torn Fudala-Town Planner, Charles Rowley-Consultant Engineer CALL To ORDER The Town of 1lrl shp a Planning Board meetingwas opened with a quorum in the W quoit -Meeting Room at Mashpee Town IJ II by Chairman Petersen at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 47 2014 and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. "PRO AL of MR4UTES—May 21,21114 MOTION: Vis. Waygan Made a.motion to accept as presented. fir. Bal arini seconded the motion. AR voted unanimously. PUBLIC ARING :10 Hearing under the provisions of Ma sachuseits General Laws Chapter 95, Sections A and 3B,to consider a proposed change in the nine of"Bast way" to either "Cottage Dane," "Cobblestone bane"or"Cardinal Lane"(Continued from May 7, 2014). The appointed time having arrived, Chairman Petersen read for the record the public hearing notice. 'Mr. Fudala indicated that a meeting had occurred with tate residents and referenced four documents, pertaining to the hearing, in Board Members" packets. Assistant Town Manager Torn Mayo was present to address the issue referencing the orifi request to rename Fast way due to possible confusion with Fast Road. Mr. Mayo indicated that more discussion was needed with the residents and a well-attended meeting occuffed on May I SP with minutes drafted by 11th. McStay of the Sandalwood Mllage Associati.on provided to the Planning Board. Mr. Mayo indicated that the Address working Group provided explan for the concerns expressed by Sandalwood residents, as well as the importance and reason for chnging the street name. Ms. Waygan inquired about the number of times that n emergency response confusion occurred between Fast way and Fast Road. Mr. Mayo indicated that there had not been confusion between the two streets. The Chair opened up public comment. John Clark, of East way, read a letter submitted on behalf of the residents and signed by the residents of East Way. The letter expressed appreciation for the good intentions of the Address working Group, although they did not agree with the intent or process of changing the strut name. The letter indicated that much discussion had occurred with residents regarding their concerns and cited the name change being unnecessary because 1 the street names with potential issues could be flagged within the 911 system and changing the name the strut would place residents at high risk due to the resulting confusion. Ilr_ Clark referenced issues and confusion he encountered when he changed his business address. The letter was submitted to the Planning Board# for the record, along with 1