Laserfiche WebLink
the center of the Keeter property. fir. Gregg stated that fir. Walter's results would impact <br /> Options 1 B and 1 C. <br /> Mr. Gregg described.option 1 C as the towns neighboring Mashpee being treated the same as <br /> Option I A and Mashpee being-treated the same as option 1B. Within Mashpee, the purple areas <br /> will be addressed at Willowbend,, the green areas at Site 4,, the pink areas.at Back Road and the <br /> yellow areas at Keeter. The use of Rock Landing and New Seabury has been removed. <br /> Mr. Gregg proceeded to describe the more simplified table'representing the thresholds as <br /> identified by UE . 1r. Gregg stated that the thresholds were related to wastewater, and were <br /> used to make up the TMDL value. In option l A, values exceeded the TSL as denoted in red, <br /> though they still may meet the ultimate modeling goals. Charman Fudala expressed concern <br /> about the Mashpee River. Mr. Gregg responded that the results from the modeling may allow <br /> additional adjustments which could'then enable the removal of more flow from the Mashpee <br /> River watershed. ,The Chair noted that there were three sentinel stations in Waquoit Bay and one <br /> sentinel station in Popponesset Bay. Mr. Gregg stated that additional information was needed <br /> from USGS for both the Keeter property arra(tock Landing. <br /> Mr. Lyons made a motion to send the options to AMP. Mr. Ylenert seconded the motion. <br /> There was an inquiry regarding the timeline to complete the modeling. Chairman Fudala <br /> responded that it would depend upon USES and that he was unsure of NEF's timing. -_r. Gregg <br /> responded that he would adjust the values in his report based on the results of Mr. Walter's <br /> particle tracking. Mr. regg will send his draft report to MEP for an initial review, and will <br /> provide any adjustments needed based on the results from USGS. Mr. Gregg added that he <br /> would further-discuss with lr. Eichner about the increased attenuation from man-made ponds in <br /> certain watersheds, and whether additional modeling.would be necessary. i <br /> The Chair inquired about whether or not the three options included the PRB at Pirate's Cove. <br /> Mr. Gregg responded that options 1B and I C include pirate's Cove recharging at 3 mg 1, but did <br /> not specify use of any particular technology. In option 1 A, Pirate's Cove was tied into the <br /> system to Rock Landing. There was also discussion about wild out and the Chair stated that it <br /> was determined based on existing loads on existing properties, and that any permitted projects <br /> were input and any remaining rave land was used on what zoning would allow. It was noted <br /> that the average water use was based on records from the Water District. The Chair stated that <br /> build out had been updated since 2001. <br /> All voted unanimously. <br /> Invoices <br /> -GHD Invoice for$1,000 from SRF:Lown-Chairman Fudala referenced the invoice received <br /> from GHD and the monthly progress,report highlighting the work completed. The Chair stated <br /> that the-expenditures totaled $271,276 so far, with approximately$70,000 remaining. <br /> Mr. Lyons made a motion to sign the voucher for$1,000 for GHD. Mr. Gurnee seconded <br /> the motion. All voted unanimously. � <br /> 2 <br />